ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2025
Subsequent risk of cancer among adults with peripheral artery disease in the community: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disproportionate Risk of Cancer Following Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Atypical Melanoma of the Lateral Fifth Metatarsal Shaft: A Rare Presentation With Minimal Mitotic Activity.Cureus · 2026Article
- Risk Factors Associated With Incidence of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Cancer Development in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: JACC: CardioOncology Short-Form Primer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Review
- Ischemic Injury Drives Nascent Tumor Growth Via Accelerated Hematopoietic Aging.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSeveral studies reported an increased cancer risk related to lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) but had important caveats: not accounting for key confounders like smoking, follow-up <10 years, or no race-specific results. To assess the long-term independent association of PAD with cancer incidence in a bi-racial community-based cohort.
methodsWe categorized 13,106 ARIC participants without cancer at baseline (mean age 54.0 [SD 5.7] years, 45.7 % male, and 26.1 % Black) into symptomatic PAD (clinical history or intermittent claudication), asymptomatic PAD (ankle-brachial index [ABI] ≤0.9), and five ABI categories (0.1-interval between 0.9 and 1.3 and > 1.3). We used cancer registries and medical records to ascertain cancer cases and ran multivariable Cox models.
resultsDuring the median follow-up of 25.3 years, there were 4143 incident cancer cases. 25-year cumulative incidence was 37.2 % in symptomatic PAD, 32.3 % in asymptomatic PAD, and 28.0-31.0 % in the other categories. Symptomatic and asymptomatic PAD remained significantly associated with cancer incidence after adjusting for potential confounders, including smoking and diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42 [1.05-1.92] and 1.24 [1.05-1.46], respectively). When stratified by smoking status, we observed a robust association of PAD (symptomatic and asymptomatic combined) vs. no PAD with cancer risk in ever smokers (HR 1.42 [1.21-1.67]) but not in never smokers. The results were most evident for lung cancer (HR 2.16 (95 %CI 1.65-2.83) for PAD vs. no PAD within ever smokers).
conclusionsSymptomatic and asymptomatic PAD conferred cancer risk, particularly among ever smokers and for lung cancer. Patients with PAD should receive evidence-based cancer prevention and screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.