Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39305831›Full record

ArticleEarly human development2024

Commercial infant products influence body position and muscle use.

Danielle N Siegel, Sarah Goldrod, Christopher Wilson, Andrew Bossert, Trevor J Lujan, Brandi N Whitaker, John L Carroll, Erin M Mannen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle N SiegelBiomedical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Sarah GoldrodMechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Christopher WilsonMechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Andrew BossertMechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Trevor J LujanBiomedical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America; Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Brandi N WhitakerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America.
John L CarrollDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America.
Erin M MannenBiomedical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America; Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America. Electronic address: ErinMannen@boisestate.edu.

Funding

Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.P20GM148321 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Paul Henry Davis · 2023 to 2026
$10.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM148321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The musculoskeletal and motor development of infants is affected by their environment, which varies from being held, lying on a firm flat surface, to seated in various nursery products. Nursery products can alter the body position of infants, particularly the position of the head/neck and trunk, which may inhibit an infant's ability to breathe. With U.S. infants spending an increasing amount of time in seated products, the purpose of this study was to assess muscle activation and body position in four commercial infant products (carrier, bouncer, rocker, and swing) during supine and prone positioning, compared to a firm flat surface. Thirteen healthy infants (age: 4.2 ± 1.4 months; 7 M/6F) were enrolled in this IRB-approved in-vivo biomechanics study. Surface electromyography sensors recorded muscle activity of the erector spinae, cervical paraspinals, quadriceps, and abdominal muscles and retro-reflective markers tracked movements to determine head-neck, trunk, and torso-pelvis flexion/extension in the sagittal plane. While supine, infants exhibited increased head-neck and trunk flexion of up to 21° and 27° above the playmat, respectively, in all seated products. While prone, high abdominal muscle activation compared to the playmat indicates that infants will fatigue faster in seated products. Additionally, the lower muscle activation levels exhibited in younger infants (< 4 months) compared to older infants (≥ 4 months) indicates that younger infants rely on the product design to maintain body position. However, offering infants a variety of environments to move within is important to avoid motor delay, therefore future work should explore how long-term use may impact an infant's development.

Indexed as

Infant EquipmentFemaleHumansInfantMaleMuscle, SkeletalPostureProne PositionSupine PositionBaby gearInclineMotor developmentSIDSSuffocation

Identifiers

PMID39305831
PMCPMC11560562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.