ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2024
Introducing a new severity specifier for schizophrenia: conceptual framework and clinical implications.
Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with schizophrenia represent a group heterogeneous in clinical presentation and severity. Although severity has been operationalized in different ways, mostly on a gradient between symptom severity and functional impairment, such approaches are limited in capturing real-world functioning. We suggest adopting the severity model proposed by DSM-5 for autism spectrum disorders. The model defines three levels of severity based on the support required, directly addressing two barriers from previous models: real-world functioning and ease of implementation. Our adapted model includes three new features: first, this severity specifier is global, rather than for each symptom domain; second, the centrality of occupational functioning is emphasized to define the level of support; third, we propose a 1-month timeframe for severity appraisal, standardizing the assessment process. Considering practical utility, we indicate how severity assessment can guide clinical practice towards rehabilitation. Additionally, we outline operational definitions for severity and functioning in schizophrenia, aligned with the premises of our model. Finally, we acknowledge potential limitations, the most relevant being the need for empirical validation. The model is presented to foster discussion. Additional studies will follow to investigate inter-rater reliability and convergent validation with standard measures of symptom and functioning severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.