Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39305470›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2024

Quantifying hubness to predict surgical outcomes in epilepsy: Assessing resection-hub alignment in interictal intracranial EEG networks.

Ruxue Gong, Rebecca W Roth, Kaitlyn Hull, Haris Rashid, William A Vandergrift, Alexandra Parashos, Nishant Sinha, Kathryn A Davis, Leonardo Bonilha, Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruxue GongDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-6414
Rebecca W RothDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-3946
Kaitlyn HullDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Haris RashidDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
William A VandergriftDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Alexandra ParashosDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Nishant SinhaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2090-4889
Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Ezequiel GleichgerrchtDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-4146

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
National Neuropsychological Network (NNN)R01MH118514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DANIEL L DRANE, David W. Loring · 2019 to 2026
$9.4M
Predicting Epilepsy Surgery Outcomes Using Neural Network ArchitectureR01NS110347 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F, DRANE, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Optimized Intracranial EEG Targeting in Focal Epilepsy based upon Neuroimaging ConnectomicsR01NS116504 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR-002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR-002378NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118514NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110347NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS-110347NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116504NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS-116504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntracranial EEG can identify epilepsy-related networks in patients with focal epilepsy; however, the association between network organization and post-surgical seizure outcomes remains unclear. Hubness serves as a critical metric to assess network organization by identifying brain regions that are highly influential to other regions. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that favorable post-operative seizure outcomes are associated with the surgical removal of interictal network hubs, measured by the novel metric "Resection-Hub Alignment Degree (RHAD)."

methodsWe analyzed Phase II interictal intracranial EEG from 69 patients with epilepsy who were seizure-free (n = 45) and non-seizure-free (n = 24) 1 year post-operatively. Connectivity matrices were constructed from intracranial EEG recordings using imaginary coherence in various frequency bands, and centrality metrics were applied to identify network hubs. The RHAD metric quantified the congruence between hubs and resected/ablated areas. We used a logistic regression model, incorporating other clinical factors, and evaluated the association of this alignment regarding post-surgical seizure outcomes.

resultsThere was a significant difference in RHAD in fast gamma (80-200 Hz) interictal network between patients with favorable and unfavorable surgical outcomes (p = .025). This finding remained similar across network definitions (i.e., channel-based or region-based network) and centrality measurements (Eigenvector, Closeness, and PageRank). The alignment between surgically removed areas and other commonly used clinical quantitative measures (seizure-onset zone, irritative zone, high-frequency oscillations zone) did not reveal significant differences in post-operative outcomes. This finding suggests that the hubness measurement may offer better predictive performance and finer-grained network analysis. In addition, the RHAD metric showed explanatory validity both alone (area under the curve [AUC] = .66) and in combination with surgical therapy type (resection vs ablation, AUC = .71). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings underscore the role of network hub surgical removal, measured through the RHAD metric of interictal intracranial EEG high gamma networks, in enhancing our understanding of seizure outcomes in epilepsy surgery.

Indexed as

ElectrocorticographyAdolescentAdultBrainElectroencephalographyEpilepsies, PartialEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultcentrality measurementsepilepsyhubnessinterictal intracranial EEGResection‐Hub Alignment Degree

Identifiers

PMID39305470
PMCPMC11573634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.