ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2024
Effects of Replicative Senescence of Human Chorionic MSCs on their EV-miRNA Profile.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes for Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Translational Challenges.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Beyond Passage Numbers: How Culture Conditions and Population-Doubling Metrics Reporting Shape the Quality of Umbilical Cord-Derived MSCs and Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in aging and regeneration.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Proteomic Study Revealed a Distinction Between Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Sources.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Article
- Chorion tissue- and plasma-derived extracellular vesicles exhibit superior anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chorionic mesenchymal stromal cells (CHO-MSCs) and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) are becoming increasingly popular, since chorion is ethically harmless and an easily accessible source of MSCs. However, until now there is only a limited number of studies with a thorough characterization of CHO-MSCs derived EVs and their miRNA profile. In this study, we monitored changes in the EV-miRNA profile between early and late passage of human CHO-MSCs. First, senescence of CHO-MSCs was induced by serial passaging and confirmed by morphological changes, shortened telomeres and changes in the expression of selected genes. The expression of MSCs-specific surface markers CD73, CD90, CD105 did not change with increasing passages. Next, EVs and their miRNA profiles were compared between early vs late passage cells. Number of EVs and their size were not significantly changed. Seven of the top 10 most expressed EV-miRNAs were common to both early and late passages. A differential expression study between early and late passages identified 37 significantly differentially expressed EV-miRNAs, out of which 23 were found to be associated with pathways of cellular senescence based on KEGG pathway analysis. A set of 9 miRNAs were identified as the most frequently associated with senescence and/or with the most altered expression between early and late passages, out of which miR-145-5p, miR-335-5p and miR-199b-3p were the most significant downregulated miRNAs in late passages. The most upregulated EV-miRNAs were miR-1307-3p, miR-3615 and miR320b. Targeting these miRNAs in future experiments may prolong the therapeutic potential of CHO-MSCs and their EVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.