ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Systolic versus diastolic differences in cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnic and hypocapnic challenges.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex comparison of cerebrovascular reactivity to COJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Article
- Physiological evaluation of the Calgary adapted aRm ergometer (CARE) concussion exertion test in adolescent athletes: A repeated-measures observational study.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- N95 masks increase brain blood velocity and parasympathetic outflow, yet worsen orthostatic symptoms in a healthy cohort.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Exercise intolerance and time to medical clearance to return to sport following sport-related concussion in adolescents.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) describes the vasculature's response to vasoactive stimuli, where prior investigations relied solely on mean data, rather than exploring cardiac cycle differences.
methodsSeventy-one participants (46 females and 25 males) from two locations underwent TCD measurements within the middle or posterior cerebral arteries (MCA, PCA). Females were tested in the early-follicular phase. The hypercapnia response was assessed using a rebreathing protocol (93% oxygen and 7% carbon dioxide) or dynamic end-tidal forcing as a cerebral blood velocity (CBv) change from 40 to 55-Torr. The hypocapnia response was quantified using a hyperventilation protocol as a CBv change from 40 to 25-Torr. Absolute and relative CVR slopes were compared across cardiac cycle phases, vessels, and biological sexes using analysis of covariance with Tukey post-hoc comparisons.
resultsNo differences were found between hypercapnia methods used (p > 0.050). Absolute hypercapnic slopes were highest in systole (p < 0.001), with no cardiac cycle differences for absolute hypocapnia (p > 0.050). Relative slopes were largest in diastole and smallest in systole for both hypercapnia and hypocapnia (p < 0.001). Females exhibited greater absolute CVR responses (p < 0.050), while only the relative systolic hypercapnic response was different between sexes (p = 0.001). Absolute differences were present between the MCA and PCA (p < 0.001), which vanished when normalizing data to baseline values (p > 0.050).
conclusionCardiac cycle variations impact CVR responses, with females displaying greater absolute CVR in some cardiac phases during the follicular window. These findings are likely due to sex differences in endothelial receptors/signalling pathways. Future CVR studies should employ assessments across the cardiac cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39305369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.