Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39305202›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Calcium channel blocker overdose: Not all the same toxicity.

Geoffrey K Isbister, Shane Jenkins, Keith Harris, Michael A Downes, Katherine Z Isoardi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spotlight commentary-Insulin therapy: Future directions.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comment on "Vasopressor Use, Critical Care Management and Outcomes in Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity".Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Calcium channel blocker overdose: Not all the same toxicity.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geoffrey K IsbisterClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-7419
Shane JenkinsClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Keith HarrisClinical Toxicology Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Michael A DownesClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Katherine Z IsoardiClinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCalcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose remains an important poisoning, with increasing availability of dihydropyridines. We aimed to compare the severity and treatment of CCB overdoses.

methodsWe reviewed CCB overdoses presenting to two toxicology services from 2014 to 2023. We extracted prospectively collected data from a clinical database, including demographics, dose, co-ingestants, complications, treatments and outcomes, to compare different CCBs.

resultsThere were 236 overdoses; median age 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 41-65 years); 130 (55%) were females. Dihydropyridine overdoses increased significantly: median of nine cases annually (IQR: 8.8-12.3) during the study compared to a median of three cases annually (IQR: 1-4.3; P < 0.001) in the 10 years prior. The commonest agent was amlodipine (147), then lercanidipine (28), diltiazem (27), verapamil (23) and felodipine (11). Median defined daily dose ingested was higher for dihydropyridines, and cardiac co-ingestants were common except verapamil. Median length of stay was 21 h (IQR: 13-43 h), which was similar except longer for diltiazem (median, 39 h). Fifty-six patients (24%) were admitted to intensive care, more often for diltiazem (14; 52%) and verapamil (7; 30%). Dysrhythmias occurred in 19 patients (diltiazem [9], verapamil [8], amlodipine [2]), and included 13 junctional dysrhythmias. Hypotension occurred in 91 patients (39%), 62 (26%) received inotropes/vasopressors (adrenaline 32 [52%], noradrenaline 48 [77%]), 21 (9%) high-dose insulin and 44 (19%) calcium. Adrenaline and high-dose insulin were more commonly given in diltiazem and verapamil overdoses, compared to vasopressors in dihydropyridine overdoses. Acute kidney injury occurred in 39 patients. Seven (3%) patients died.

conclusionsDihydropyridines were the commonest CCB overdoses, with amlodipine making up half. More severe toxicity occurred with diltiazem and verapamil.

Indexed as

Calcium Channel BlockersDrug OverdoseAdultAgedDihydropyridinesFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCalcium Channel BlockersDihydropyridinesamlodipinecalcium channel blockerdihydropyridinesinotropesoverdose

Identifiers

PMID39305202
PMCPMC11862784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.