Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39305129›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024

'It's all settled on the right page' surrogates' feelings and reflections of surrogacy two decades on.

K Shaw, S Imrie, P Hall, V Jadva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K ShawCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
S ImrieCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-6559
P HallCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
V JadvaCentre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-0694

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 208013/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow do surrogates think, feel, and reflect on their experiences of being a surrogate over time? SUMMARY ANSWER: Despite continuing to require physical, emotional, and interpersonal labour, surrogates in this study reflected positively on their experiences of being a surrogate decades later. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Research on families created through surrogacy shows that it can be a positive experience for both the intended parents and the surrogate. No existing research has examined the experiences of surrogacy for surrogates beyond 10 years post-birth. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 women who had completed a total of 71 surrogacy arrangements. Participants had given birth to their first surrogate child on average 20 years previously. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS

methodsData were collected about (i) surrogates' relationships with the families they had helped, (ii) how important being a surrogate was to their own identity, and (iii) how they felt surrogacy was perceived by the public. Data were analysed according to the principles of reflexive thematic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Surrogates' reflections on their experiences were constructed into two themes: (i) hard work but worth it and (ii) part of who I am. Surrogacy had taken a physical toll on some participants, and for most, being a surrogate continued to involve emotional labour and effort to maintain relationships with the families. Making friends through the process and feeling proud of what they had done to help someone meant that overall, surrogates reflected positively on surrogacy and had incorporated their experiences as surrogates into a stable aspect of their identity. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is a risk of selection bias, with surrogates who had a more positive experience being more likely to continue to participate in the research. All surrogacies occurred within the UK. While the sample is relatively diverse in terms of surrogates' ages, current employment status, and relationship status, the sample lacks ethnic diversity. Most participants had been surrogates for heterosexual couples, and thus long-term relationships involving gay couples or single men may differ. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings from this study show the importance of understanding surrogacy as a 'relational' process and suggest to prospective surrogates and intended parents what they may expect from their relationship over time. Given the findings that even as the children grow up, being a surrogate continues to require emotional labour, support should be made available to surrogates over the longer term if required. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This project was funded by the Wellcome Trust [grant number 208013/Z/17/Z] and the University of Cambridge Returning Carers Scheme. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

EmotionsGestational CarriersAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative Researchgeneticgestational surrogacyintended parentsqualitativerelationshipssurrogacysurrogatestraditional surrogacy

Identifiers

PMID39305129
PMCPMC11630071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.