Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39305127›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2025

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of androgen measurement in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis to inform evidence-based guidelines.

Asmamaw Demis Bizuneh, Anju E Joham, Helena Teede, Aya Mousa, Arul Earnest, James M Hawley, Laura Smith, Ricardo Azziz, Wiebke Arlt, Chau Thien Tay

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Redefining testosterone reference ranges for adult females.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SomeJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Living with PCOS: A Narrative of its Biology, Diagnosis, and Evolving Treatment.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Asmamaw Demis BizunehMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anju E JohamMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-2568
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-577X
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Arul EarnestSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
James M HawleyDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Laura SmithSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Ricardo AzzizDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Wiebke ArltMedical Research Council, Laboratory of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
Chau Thien TayMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-2654

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research CouncilCentre for Research Excellence for Women's Health in Reproductive Life APP1171592Clinical Research TrainingCRE in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome APP1078444Endocrine SocietyEuropean Society of EndocrinologyEuropean Society of Human Reproduction and EmbryologyInternational Evidence-based Guideline in PCOSMedical Research Council MC_UP_1605/15Monash Graduate ScholarshipMonash International Tuition ScholarshipMonash UniversityMRC MC_UP_1605/15NHMRCThe American Society for Reproductive MedicineWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT209492/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiochemical hyperandrogenism is a hallmark and diagnostic feature of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the most accurate androgen measurement for assessing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS diagnosis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This systematic review aimed to assess different androgen measures [including total testosterone (TT), calculated free testosterone (cFT), free androgen index (FAI), androstenedione (A4), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] for accuracy in diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in women with PCOS, to inform the 2023 International PCOS Evidence-based Guidelines. SEARCH

methodsTo update evidence from the 2018 International PCOS Guidelines, a systematic search from 3 July 2017 to 23 June 2023 was conducted across Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, all EBM, EMBASE, and PsycInfo for articles evaluating androgens in the diagnosis of biochemical hyperandrogenism. The revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using STATA 18 software. Summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% CIs using the bivariate model, while the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (ROC) model was used to produce a summary ROC curve. OUTCOMES: Of 23 studies reviewed, 18 were included in the meta-analysis, with data from 2857 participants (1650 with PCOS and 1207 controls). For diagnosing biochemical hyperandrogenism in PCOS, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% CI were for TT: 0.74 (0.63-0.82), 0.86 (0.77-0.91), and 0.87 (0.84-0.90); cFT: 0.89 (0.69-0.96), 0.83 (0.79-0.86), and 0.85 (0.81-0.88); FAI: 0.78 (0.70-0.83), 0.85 (0.76-0.90), and 0.87 (0.84-0.90); A4: 0.75 (0.60-0.86), 0.71 (0.51-0.85), and 0.80 (0.76-0.83); and DHEAS: 0.75 (0.61-0.85), 0.67 (0.48-0.81), and 0.77 (0.73-0.81), respectively. In subgroup analyses, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) had superior sensitivity for measuring cFT, FAI, A4, and DHEAS, and superior specificity for measuring TT, cFT, and FAI, compared to the direct immunoassay method. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Our results directly informed the 2023 International PCOS Guideline recommendations to use TT and FT as the first-line laboratory tests to assess biochemical hyperandrogenism in the diagnosis of PCOS. cFT should be assessed by equilibrium dialysis or ammonium sulfate precipitation, or calculated using FAI. If TT or cFT are not elevated, A4 and DHEAS could also be considered, noting their poorer specificity. Laboratories should utilize LC-MS/MS for androgen measurement given its high accuracy. Future studies should focus on establishing optimal normative cut-off values in large, unselected, and ethnically diverse cohorts of women. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The review protocol was prepublished in the 2023 PCOS Guideline Technical Report (https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/3379591/TechnicalReport-2023.pdf).

Indexed as

AndrogensHyperandrogenismPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAndrostenedioneDehydroepiandrosterone SulfateEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSensitivity and SpecificityTestosteroneAndrogensAndrostenedioneDehydroepiandrosterone SulfateTestosteroneandrogendiagnostic accuracyhyperandrogenemiahyperandrogenismPCOSsensitivityspecificitytestosterone

Identifiers

PMID39305127
PMCPMC11696697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.