Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304962›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Deep learning applications in breast cancer histopathological imaging: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Bitao Jiang, Lingling Bao, Songqin He, Xiao Chen, Zhihui Jin, Yingquan Ye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An interpretable breast cancer risk stratification model via multi-omics integration: multi-method development and cross-cohort validation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The consensus molecular subtypes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bitao Jiang *Department of Hematology and Oncology, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, 315800, China. jiangbitao@163.com.
Lingling Bao *Department of Hematology and Oncology, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, 315800, China.
Songqin HeDepartment of Oncology, The 906th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ningbo, 315100, China.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Oncology, The 906th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ningbo, 315100, China.
Zhihui JinDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, 315800, China.
Yingquan YeDepartment of Oncology, The 906th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Ningbo, 315100, China. dyz1989@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor among women worldwide and remains one of the leading causes of death among women. Its incidence and mortality rates are continuously rising. In recent years, with the rapid advancement of deep learning (DL) technology, DL has demonstrated significant potential in breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, and treatment response prediction. This paper reviews relevant research progress and applies DL models to image enhancement, segmentation, and classification based on large-scale datasets from TCGA and multiple centers. We employed foundational models such as ResNet50, Transformer, and Hover-net to investigate the performance of DL models in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction. The results indicate that DL techniques have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, particularly in predicting breast cancer metastasis and clinical prognosis. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the crucial role of robust databases in developing highly generalizable models. Future research will focus on addressing challenges related to data management, model interpretability, and regulatory compliance, ultimately aiming to provide more precise clinical treatment and prognostic evaluation programs for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPrognosisBreast cancerDeep learningDiagnosisPrognosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39304962
PMCPMC11416021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.