ArticleKnee surgery & related research2024
Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bicruciate-stabilized TKA Does Not Result in Improved Patient-reported Outcomes Compared With Posterior-stabilized TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Bilateral Simultaneous TKA.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Trial
- Cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty more closely associated with tibial bone density than cement viscosity : findings from a randomized controlled trial.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and nonsclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area.
resultsOf the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit values and mean penetration were r = -0.617 (p < 0.01) and -0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively.
conclusionThe cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared with the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.