ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024
Increased predictive value of optical spectral transmission in early rheumatoid arthritis through use of patient-adjusted cut-off scores.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing disease activity in inflammatory arthritis using optical spectral transmission: a systematic review compared to joint ultrasound, MRI, and clinical activity markers.BMC rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Infrared thermography in the detection of arthritis: a systematic review of diagnostic performance compared with joint ultrasound.Rheumatology international · 2026Pooled it
- Optical Spectral Transmission Imaging in Patients with Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study with Joint Ultrasound and Clinical Markers.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Care Model vs Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Patient Adherence.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aims of this study were to suggest patient-adjusted optical spectral transmission (OST) cut-off values for the first time and to develop clinical models that predict the probability of an early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis based on OST findings and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria as a reference standard.
methodsOST examinations were performed in newly diagnosed RA patients and healthy controls by the HandScan device. Moreover, RA patients underwent a full clinical [tender/swollen joint counts (TJC/SJC), disease activity score-28 (DAS28)] and laboratory evaluation. OST confounding factors were examined via logistic multivariate regression analyses and patient-adjusted OST-cut-offs were subsequently determined. Furthermore, statistical models to calculate the probability of an RA diagnosis, based on the measured OST values and the presence of OST influencing factors, were developed. Finally, correlations of OST with RA activity parameters were assessed.
results1.584 joints of 72 early RA patients were examined via OST and compared to 2.200 joints of 100 healthy controls and 1.166 joints of 53 patients with non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), respectively. Overall OST diagnostic performance was excellent in the whole cohort between RA- and healthy control-group [Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC): 0.810 (95%CI: 0.746-0.873); p < 0.0001], and further improved in RA-patients with ≥ 1 swollen wrist/finger joint(s) [AUC: 0.841 (95%CI: 0.773-0.908); p < 0.0001]. Comparison between RA patients and patients with non-inflammatory arthralgia showed similar results by an AUC of 0.788 (95%-CI: 0.709-0.867; p < 0.0001), and further improved in RA patients with ≥ 1 swollen wrist/finger joint(s) [AUC: 0.822 (95%CI: 0.74-0.90); p < 0.0001]. For the assessment of an adjusted RA diagnosis probability, two gender-specific statistical models were developed, based on OST values and patient age. OST cut-off values of 11.2 and 18.21 were calculated for female and male patients with active disease (sensitivity 93% and 67%; specificity 71.2% and 90%), respectively. Among RA patients, OST was associated moderately/significantly with DAS28 (r = 0.42,p < 0.001) and swollen joint count (rho = 0.355,p = 0.002).
conclusionThe development of patient-adjusted OST cut-off values and the suggested statistical models significantly enhance OST's diagnostic performance, supporting its utility in differentiating between RA and non-inflammatory conditions. Future research should include a broader spectrum of arthritis types to validate OST's comprehensive diagnostic utility also across various inflammatory arthritides.
trial registrationDRKS00016752 (German Registry of Clinical Trials).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.