Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304924›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2024

Extensive immunophenotypic sub-population analysis of StemRegenin1 expanded haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Juanita Mellet, Candice L Hendricks, Voula Stivaktas, Chrisna Durandt, Melvin A Ambele, Michael S Pepper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juanita Mellet *Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Candice L Hendricks *Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Voula StivaktasBeckman Coulter Life Sciences, Centurion, South Africa.
Chrisna DurandtInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Melvin A AmbeleInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Michael S PepperInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medical Immunology, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. michael.pepper@up.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-2380

Funding

Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Pretoria Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of PretoriaSouth African Medical Research Council SAMRC-RFA-UFSP-01-2013/STEM CELLS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEx vivo haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPCs) expansion constitutes an important area of research, and has the potential to improve access to umbilical cord blood (UCB) as a source of stem cells for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The ability to improve stem cell dose and thereby reduce delayed engraftment times, which has plagued the use of UCB as a stem cell source since inception, is a recognised advantage. The extent to which cluster of differentiation (CD)34 sub-populations are affected by expansion with StemRegenin1 (SR1), and whether a particular subtype may account for better engraftment than others, is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of SR1-induced HSPC expansion on CD34+ immunophenotypic subsets and gene expression profiles.

methodsUCB-derived CD34+ HSPCs were characterised before (D0) and after expansion (D7) with SR1 using an extensive immunophenotypic panel. In addition, gene expression was assessed and differentially expressed genes were categorised into biological processes.

resultsA dose-dependent increase in the number of CD34+ HSPCs was observed with SR1 treatment, and unbiased and extensive HSPC immunophenotyping proved to be a powerful tool in identifying unique sub-populations within the HSPC repertoire. In this regard, we found that SR1 promotes the emergence of HSPC subsets which may aid engraftment post expansion. In addition, we observed that SR1 has a minimal effect on the transcriptome of 7-day expanded CD34+ HSPCs when compared to cells expanded without SR1, with only two genes being downregulated in the former.

conclusionThis study revealed that SR1 selects for potentially novel immunophenotypic HSPC subsets post expansion and has a minimal effect on the transcriptome of 7-day expanded HSPCs when compared to vehicle controls. Whether these distinct immunophenotypic sub-populations possess greater engraftment capacity remains to be tested in animal models.

Indexed as

Antigens, CD34Fetal BloodHematopoietic Stem CellsImmunophenotypingCell DifferentiationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansPurinesAntigens, CD34PurinesStemRegenin 1Ex vivo expansionGene expression profilesHaematopoietic stem and progenitor cellsImmunophenotypeStemRegenin1Umbilical cord blood

Identifiers

PMID39304924
PMCPMC11416017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.