Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304815›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024

Is the combination of interfascial plane blocks sufficient for awake breast cancer surgery? An observational, prospective, proof-of-concept study.

Gamze Ertas, Hamiyet Senol Cakmak, Sonmez Ocak, Mert Yılmaz, Dursun Burak Ozdemir, Serkan Tulgar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07401602 (A Retrospective Evaluation of Systemic Analgesia, Rhomboid Intercostal Block, and Combined Rhomboid Intercostal Block With Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block After Mastectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07401602 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Retrospective Evaluation of Systemic Analgesia, Rhomboid Intercostal Block, and Combined Rhomboid Intercostal Block With Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block After Mastectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorIstinye UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsAnalgesic Strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gamze ErtasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı Kadıköy Mahallesi No : 199 PK : 55090 İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey. gamzertas.md@hotmail.com.
Hamiyet Senol CakmakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı Kadıköy Mahallesi No : 199 PK : 55090 İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey.
Sonmez OcakDepartment of General Surgery, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Mert YılmazDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı Kadıköy Mahallesi No : 199 PK : 55090 İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey.
Dursun Burak OzdemirDepartment of General Surgery, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Serkan TulgarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı Kadıköy Mahallesi No : 199 PK : 55090 İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, often necessitating surgical intervention. While surgeries like lumpectomy can be performed under local anesthesia, more extensive procedures typically require general anesthesia. Awake breast cancer surgery has emerged as an alternative due to risks associated with general anesthesia and patient preference.

methodsThis prospective observational study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for awake breast surgery. Patients aged 18-80 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery were included, following ethical committee approval and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were prior breast surgery, coagulopathies, infections, allergies to local anesthetics, psychiatric disorders, body mass index over 40 kg/m², and chest deformities. The combination of interpectoral, pecto-serratus, and deep serratus plane blocks was used as the primary anesthetic method, with a superficial parasternal block added in cases where complete cutaneous coverage was not achieved.

resultsSeventeen patients were enrolled. The primary outcome, sufficient surgical anesthesia without deep sedation, was achieved in 15 patients. The combination of the aforementioned blocks proved effective, with an average surgery duration of 59.66 min, and propofol requirements averaging 1.77 mg/kg/hour. Most patients reported high satisfaction levels, and no early or late block-related complications were observed.

conclusionThe combination of fascial plane blocks is a viable option for awake breast cancer surgery, potentially eliminating the need for more invasive anesthesia techniques. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in larger, homogeneous patient groups.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNerve BlockAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProof of Concept StudyProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalWakefulnessYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalAwake surgeryBreast surgeryNerve blockPlane blocksRegional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39304815
PMCPMC11414308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.