Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304761›Full record

SynthesisNature biomedical engineering2025

Meta-analysis of the make-up and properties of in vitro models of the healthy and diseased blood-brain barrier.

James G Shamul, Zhiyuan Wang, Hyeyeon Gong, Wenquan Ou, Alisa M White, Diogo P Moniz-Garcia, Shuo Gu, Alisa Morss Clyne, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Xiaoming He

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Comparative analysis of the uptake of the HFluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025
    Article
  18. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  19. A Biomimetic Human Multi-Cellular In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Permeability Benchmarking: Guidelines for ComparingJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James G ShamulFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Zhiyuan WangFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Hyeyeon GongFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Wenquan OuFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Alisa M WhiteFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Diogo P Moniz-GarciaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Shuo GuRNA Mediated Gene Regulation Section, RNA Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Alisa Morss ClyneFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Alfredo Quiñones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. quinones-hinojosa.alfredo@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-5968
Xiaoming HeFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. shawnhe@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0125-6086

Funding

Training Grant in Cancer BiologyT32CA154274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Toni M Antalis, CURT I CIVIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.8M
Multiscale hydrogel biomaterials-enabled 3D modeling of cancer drug resistanceR01CA279815 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Wenquan Ou · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA279815NCI NIH HHS T32 CA154274U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01CA279815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) are increasingly used to develop therapeutics that can cross the BBB for treating diseases of the central nervous system. Here we report a meta-analysis of the make-up and properties of transwell and microfluidic models of the healthy BBB and of BBBs in glioblastoma, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and inflammatory diseases. We found that the type of model, the culture method (static or dynamic), the cell types and cell ratios, and the biomaterials employed as extracellular matrix are all crucial to recapitulate the low permeability and high expression of tight-junction proteins of the BBB, and to obtain high trans-endothelial electrical resistance. Specifically, for models of the healthy BBB, the inclusion of endothelial cells and pericytes as well as physiological shear stresses (~10-20 dyne cm

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierModels, BiologicalAlzheimer DiseaseAstrocytesCell Culture TechniquesElectric ImpedanceEndothelial CellsHumansPericytes

Identifiers

PMID39304761
PMCPMC11922799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.