ArticleCommunications biology2024
Interlimb coordination is not strictly controlled during walking.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NONAN GaitPrint: An IMU gait database of healthy middle-aged adults.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In human walking, the left and right legs move alternately, half a stride out of phase with each other. Although various parameters, such as stride frequency and length, vary with walking speed, the antiphase relationship remains unchanged. In contrast, during walking in left-right asymmetric situations, the relative phase shifts from the antiphase condition to compensate for the asymmetry. Interlimb coordination is important for adaptive walking and we expect that interlimb coordination is strictly controlled during walking. However, the control mechanism remains unclear. In the present study, we derived a quantity that models the control of interlimb coordination during walking using two coupled oscillators based on the phase reduction theory and Bayesian inference method. The results were not what we expected. Specifically, we found that the relative phase is not actively controlled until the deviation from the antiphase condition exceeds a certain threshold. In other words, the control of interlimb coordination has a dead zone like that in the case of the steering wheel of an automobile. It is conjectured that such forgoing of control enhances energy efficiency and maneuverability. Our discovery of the dead zone in the control of interlimb coordination provides useful insight for understanding gait control in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.