Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304615›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Bicycle Set-Up Dimensions and Cycling Kinematics: A Consensus Statement Using Delphi Methodology.

Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada, Marco Arkesteijn, William Bertucci, Rodrigo R Bini, Felipe P Carpes, Fernando Diefenthaeler, Sylvain Dorel, Borut Fonda, Anthony A Gatti, Wendy Holliday and 8 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jose Ignacio Priego-QuesadaResearch Group in Sports Biomechanics (GIBD), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Gascó Oliag, 3, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Marco ArkesteijnDepartment of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK.
William BertucciRed Española de Investigación del Rendimiento Deportivo en Ciclismo y Mujer (REDICYM), Ontinyent, Spain.
Rodrigo R BiniRed Española de Investigación del Rendimiento Deportivo en Ciclismo y Mujer (REDICYM), Ontinyent, Spain.
Felipe P CarpesRed Española de Investigación del Rendimiento Deportivo en Ciclismo y Mujer (REDICYM), Ontinyent, Spain.
Fernando DiefenthaelerLaboratório de Biomecânica, Centro de Desportos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Sylvain DorelNantes Université, Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, UR 4334, 44000, Nantes, France.
Borut FondaFaculty of Health Studies, University of Primorska, Izola, Slovenia.
Anthony A GattiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Wendy HollidayDivision of Sports and Exercise Medicine, HPALS Research Center, University of Cape Town, Boundary Rd, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ina JanssenSport Science and Innovation, Sportcentrum Papendal, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Jose L López ElviraRed Española de Investigación del Rendimiento Deportivo en Ciclismo y Mujer (REDICYM), Ontinyent, Spain.
Geoffrey MillourLaboratoire de technologies & d'innovation pour la performance sportive, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Pedro Perez-SorianoResearch Group in Sports Biomechanics (GIBD), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Gascó Oliag, 3, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Jeroen SwartDivision of Sports and Exercise Medicine, HPALS Research Center, University of Cape Town, Boundary Rd, Cape Town, South Africa.
Paul VisentiniLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Songning ZhangDepartment of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Alberto Encarnación-MartínezResearch Group in Sports Biomechanics (GIBD), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Gascó Oliag, 3, 46010, Valencia, Spain. alberto.encarnacion@uv.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2149-134X

Funding

Consejo Superior de Deportes, Ministerio de Cultura y Deporte, Gobierno de España 34/UPB/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bicycle set-up dimensions and cycling kinematic data are important components of bicycle fitting and cyclist testing protocols. However, there are no guidelines on how bicycles should be measured and how kinematic data should be collected to increase the reliability of outcomes. This article proposes a consensus regarding bicycle set-up dimensions and recommendations for collecting cycling-related kinematic data. Four core members recruited panellists, prepared the document to review in each round for panellists, analysed the scores and comments of the expert panellists, reported the decisions and communicated with panellists. Fourteen experts with experience in research involving cycling kinematics and/or bicycle fitting agreed to participate as panellists. An initial list of 17 statements was proposed, rated using a five-point Likert scale and commented on by panellists in three rounds of anonymous surveys following a Delphi procedure. The consensus was agreed upon when more than 80% of the panellists scored the statement with values of 4 and 5 (moderately and strongly agree) with an interquartile range of less than or equal to 1. A consensus was achieved for eight statements addressing bicycle set-up dimensions (e.g. saddle height, saddle setback, etc.) and nine statements for cycling kinematic assessment (e.g. kinematic method, two-dimensional methodology, etc.). This consensus statement provides a list of recommendations about how bicycle set-up dimensions should be measured and the best practices for collecting cycling kinematic data. These recommendations should improve the transparency, reproducibility, standardisation and interpretation of bicycle measurements and cycling kinematic data for researchers, bicycle fitters and cycling related practitioners.

Indexed as

BicyclingConsensusDelphi TechniqueBiomechanical PhenomenaEquipment DesignHumansReproducibility of ResultsSports Equipment

Identifiers

PMID39304615
PMCPMC11561003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.