Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39304593›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Automated analysis of heart sound signals in screening for structural heart disease in children.

I Papunen, K Ylänen, O Lundqvist, M Porkholm, O Rahkonen, M Mecklin, A Eerola, M Kallio, A Arola, J Niemelä and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chest auscultation - tradition and expectationsScandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

I PapunenTampere Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. ida.papunen@tuni.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-5053
K YlänenTampere Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
O LundqvistAusculThing Oy, Espoo, Finland.
M PorkholmAusculThing Oy, Espoo, Finland.
O RahkonenAusculThing Oy, Espoo, Finland.
M MecklinDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
A EerolaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
M KallioDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, New Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
A ArolaDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku, Finland.
J NiemeläDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku, Finland.
I JaakkolaAusculThing Oy, Espoo, Finland.
T PoutanenTampere Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö 5245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the ability of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm to differentiate innocent murmurs from pathologic ones. An AI-based algorithm was developed using heart sound recordings collected from 1413 patients at the five university hospitals in Finland. The corresponding heart condition was verified using echocardiography. In the second phase of the study, patients referred to Helsinki New Children's Hospital due to a heart murmur were prospectively assessed with the algorithm, and then the results were compared with echocardiography findings. Ninety-eight children were included in this prospective study. The algorithm classified 72 (73%) of the heart sounds as normal and 26 (27%) as abnormal. Echocardiography was normal in 63 (64%) children and abnormal in 35 (36%). The algorithm recognized abnormal heart sounds in 24 of 35 children with abnormal echocardiography and normal heart sounds with normal echocardiography in 61 of 63 children. When the murmur was audible, the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm were 83% (24/29) (confidence interval (CI) 64-94%) and 97% (59/61) (CI 89-100%), respectively.

conclusionThe algorithm was able to distinguish murmurs associated with structural cardiac anomalies from innocent murmurs with good sensitivity and specificity. The algorithm was unable to identify heart defects that did not cause a murmur. Further research is needed on the use of the algorithm in screening for heart murmurs in primary health care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Innocent murmurs are common in children, while the incidence of moderate or severe congenital heart defects is low. Auscultation plays a significant role in assessing the need for further examinations of the murmur. The ability to differentiate innocent murmurs from those related to congenital heart defects requires clinical experience on the part of general practitioners. No AI-based auscultation algorithms have been systematically implemented in primary health care. WHAT IS NEW: • We developed an AI-based algorithm using a large dataset of sound samples validated by echocardiography. The algorithm performed well in recognizing pathological and innocent murmurs in children from different age groups.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEchocardiographyHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart MurmursHeart SoundsAdolescentArtificial IntelligenceChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFinlandHeart AuscultationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleArtificial intelligenceCongenital heart defectElectronic stethoscopeHeart murmurScreening

Identifiers

PMID39304593
PMCPMC11473634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.