Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39303729›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Haematology2024

Decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib for advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, single-centre phase 2 trial.

Nicholas J Short, Daniel Nguyen, Elias Jabbour, Jayastu Senapati, Zhihong Zeng, Ghayas C Issa, Hussein Abbas, Cedric Nasnas, Wei Qiao, Xuelin Huang and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Haematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unveiling CrypticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Study on the impact of CD4Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nicholas J ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: nshort@mdanderson.org.
Daniel NguyenDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elias JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jayastu SenapatiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhihong ZengDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ghayas C IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hussein AbbasDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Cedric NasnasDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wei QiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Xuelin HuangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly ChienDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Fadi G HaddadDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Naveen PemmarajuDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Omer S KarrarDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Danielle NguyenDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Hagop KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
Optimizing treatment decision by accounting for longitudinal biomarker trajectories and competing risks of each individualR01CA272806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Xuelin Huang · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid disease-consisting of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the myeloid blast phase and in the accelerated phase, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia-is associated with poor outcomes. Although previous studies have suggested the benefit of chemotherapy and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, the optimal regimen is uncertain and prospective studies for this rare group of diseases are scant. Preclinical and retrospective clinical data suggest possible synergy between the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aimed to design a study to evaluate the safety and activity of a novel combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and the third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib in advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid diseases.

methodsFor this phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated or relapsed or refractory myeloid chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, or advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3 were eligible. Patients were eligible regardless of the number of previous lines of therapy received or previous receipt of ponatinib. Cycle 1 (induction) consisted of a 7-day lead-in of ponatinib 45 mg orally daily (days 1-7), followed by combination therapy with decitabine 20 mg/m

resultsBetween July 12, 2020, and July 8, 2023, 20 patients were treated (14 with chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, four with chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, and two with advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia). The median age was 43 years (IQR 32-58); 13 (65%) patients were male and seven (35%) were female; and 12 (60%) were White, three (15%) were Hispanic, four (20%) were Black, and one (5%) was Asian. 12 (60%) patients had received 2 or more previous BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 14 (70%) patients had at least one high-risk additional chromosomal abnormality or complex karyotype. The median duration of follow-up was 21·2 months (IQR 14·1-24·2). The complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery rate was 50% (10 of 20 patients); complete remission in one [5%] patient and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in nine [45%]). An additional six (30%) patients had a morphologic leukaemia-free state. The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were febrile neutropenia in eight (40%) patients, infection in six (30%), and alanine or aspartate transaminase elevation in five (25%). Eight (40%) patients had at least one cardiovascular event of any grade. There were three on-study deaths, none of which was considered related to the study treatment and all from infections in the setting of refractory leukaemia.

interpretationThe combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib is safe and shows promising activity in patients with advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, including those with multiple previous therapies or high-risk disease features. Further studies evaluating chemotherapy and venetoclax-based combination strategies using newer-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted.

fundingTakeda Oncology, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDecitabineImidazolesLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePyridazinesSulfonamidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphia ChromosomeBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDecitabineImidazolesponatinibPyridazinesSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID39303729
PMCPMC11527552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.