ArticleEBioMedicine2024
Post-surgery sequelae unrelated to disease progression and chemotherapy revealed in follow-up of patients with stage III colon cancer.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Post-surgery level of circulating DNA in stage III colon cancer patients: Impact on the reliability of minimal residual disease detection.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for determining neutrophil elastase (NE) - a potential useful marker of multi-organ damage observed in COVID-19 and post-Covid-19 (PCS).Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy in gastrointestinal oncology: clinical applications and translational integration of ctDNA, CTCs, and sEVs.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Illuminating the Role of Wound Healing-Related Hub Genes in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Prognostic Implications and Therapeutic Potential.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe studied the poorly-known dynamics of circulating DNA (cir-nDNA), as monitored prospectively over an extended post-surgery period, in patients with cancer.
methodsOn patients with stage III colon cancer (N = 120), using personalised molecular tags we carried out the prospective, multicenter, blinded cohort study of the post-surgery serial analysis of cir-nDNA concentration. 74 patients were included and 357 plasma samples tested.
findingsDuring post-operative follow-up, the patients' median cir-nDNA concentration was greater (P < 0.0001 in the [43-364 days range]) than both the median value in healthy individuals and the pre-surgery value. These cir-nDNA levels were highly associated with NETs markers (P-value associating MPO and cir-nDNA, and NE and cir-nDNA are 6.6 x 10
interpretation(1), Given the inter-patient heterogeneity, the post-surgery cir-nDNA level cannot be considered a reliable value, and caution must be exercised when determining mutation allele frequency or the mutation status; and (2), specific studies must be undertaken to investigate the possible clinical impact of the persistent, low-grade inflammation resulting from elevated NETs levels, such as observed in these post-surgery patients, given that such levels are known to potentially induce adverse cardiovascular or thrombotic events.
fundingThis work was supported by the H2020 European ERA-NET grant on Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN-2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.