ArticlePloS one2024
Factors associated with postoperative visual function after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with foveal detachment.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal Detachment Is Associated With Enhanced Correlated Firing and Oscillatory Activity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- CURRENT STATUS AND DETERMINANTS OF POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL FUNCTION-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Multivariate Analysis.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors influencing postoperative visual acuity, degree of metamorphopsia, and retinal sensitivity after vitrectomy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and foveal detachment.
methodsWe reviewed retrospectively 33 consecutive eyes of 32 patients, who underwent vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with foveal detachment between August 2018 and October 2020 and obtained retinal reattachment. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative characteristics were comprehensively analyzed using multivariate models to evaluate the presence of factors influencing best-corrected visual acuity, vertical/horizontal metamorphopsia scores using M-CHARTS (Inami & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and retinal sensitivity using the MP-3 (NIDEK Co., Aichi, Japan) at 1-year postoperatively.
resultsPreoperative total retinal detachment was the only factor significantly associated with worse best-corrected visual acuity at 1-year postoperatively (β = 0.589, P<0.001). Intraoperative internal limiting membrane peeling (β = 0.443, P = 0.003) and longer duration after recognizing visual dysfunction (β = 0.425, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with higher vertical metamorphopsia scores at 1 year. The horizontal metamorphopsia score was significantly related to the duration after recognizing visual dysfunction (β = 0.457, P = 0.008). The disappearance of the EZ line on optical coherence tomography at 3 months postoperatively (β = -0.638, P<0.001) was significantly associated with lower retinal sensitivity at 1 year.
conclusionsOur study findings suggest that best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and retinal sensitivity at 1 year after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with foveal detachment are influenced by distinct factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.