Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39302963›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Physical extraction of antigen and information.

Hongda Jiang, Shenshen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antigen mobility regulates the dynamics and precision of antigen capture in the B cell immune synapse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hongda JiangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Shenshen WangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-2118

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) MCB-2225947National Science Foundation (NSF) PHY-2146581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To respond and adapt, cells use surface receptors to sense environmental cues. While biochemical signal processing inside the cell is studied in depth, less is known about how physical processes during cell-cell contact impact signal acquisition. New experiments found that fast-evolving immune B cells in germinal centers (GCs) apply force to acquire antigen clusters prior to internalization, suggesting adaptive benefits of physical information extraction. We present a theory of stochastic antigen transfer and show that maximizing information gain via physical extraction can explain the dramatic phenotypic transition from naive to GC B cells-attenuated receptor signaling, enhanced force usage, and decentralized contact architecture. Our model suggests that binding-lifetime measurement and physical extraction serve as complementary modes of antigen recognition, greatly extending the dynamic range of affinity discrimination when combined. This physical-information framework further predicts that the optimal size of receptor clusters decreases as affinity improves, rationalizing the use of a multifocal synaptic pattern seen in GC B cells. By linking extraction dynamics to selection fidelity via discriminatory performance, we propose that cells may physically enhance information acquisition to sustain adaptive evolution.

Indexed as

AntigensB-LymphocytesAnimalsGerminal CenterHumansModels, ImmunologicalReceptors, Antigen, B-CellSignal TransductionAntigensReceptors, Antigen, B-Cellactive mechanicsadaptive immunityaffinity discriminationFisher informationselection fidelity

Identifiers

PMID39302963
PMCPMC11441497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.