ArticlePloS one2024
Packet information encoding in a cerebellum-like circuit.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Packet information encoding of neural signals was proposed for vision about 50 years ago and has recently been revived as a plausible strategy generalizable to natural and artificial sensory systems. It involves discrete image segmentation controlled by feedback and the ability to store and compare packets of information. This article shows that neurons of the cerebellum-like electrosensory lobe (EL) of the electric fish Gymnotus omarorum use spike-count and spike-timing distribution as constitutive variables of packets of information that encode one-by-one the electrosensory images generated by a self-timed series of electric organ discharges (EODs). To evaluate this hypothesis, extracellular unitary activity was recorded from the centro-medial map of the EL. Units recorded in high-decerebrate preparations were classified into six types using hierarchical cluster analysis of post-EOD spiking histograms. Cross-correlation analysis indicated that each EOD strongly influences the unit firing probability within the next inter-EOD interval. Units of the same type were similarly located in the laminar organization of the EL and showed similar stimulus-specific changes in spike count and spike timing after the EOD when a metal object was moved close by, along the fish's body parallel to the skin, or when the longitudinal impedance of a static cylindrical probe placed at the center of the receptive field was incremented in a stepwise manner in repetitive trials. These last experiments showed that spike-counts and the relative entropy, expressing a comparative measure of information before and after the step, were systematically increased with respect to a control in all unit types. The post-EOD spike-timing probability distribution and the relatively independent contribution of spike-timing and number to the content of information in the transmitted packet suggest that these are the constitutive image-encoding variables of the packets. Comparative analysis suggests that packet information transmission is a general principle for processing superposition images in cerebellum-like networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.