ArticlePloS one2024
DBDAA: A real-time approach to Dynamic Banker's Deadlock Avoidance Algorithm with optimized time complexity.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective resource allocation is crucial in operating systems to prevent deadlocks, especially when resources are limited and non-shareable. Traditional methods like the Banker's algorithm provide solutions but suffer from limitations such as static process handling, high time complexity, and a lack of real-time adaptability. To address these challenges, we propose the Dynamic Banker's Deadlock Avoidance Algorithm (DBDAA). The DBDAA introduces real-time processing for safety checks, significantly improving system efficiency and reducing the risk of deadlocks. Unlike conventional methods, the DBDAA dynamically includes processes in safety checks, considerably decreasing the number of comparisons required to determine safe states. This optimization reduces the time complexity to O(n) in the best-case and O(nd) in the average and worst-case scenarios, compared to the O(n2d) complexity of the original Banker's algorithm. The integration of real-time processing ensures that all processes can immediately engage in safety checks, improving system responsiveness and making the DBDAA suitable for dynamic and time-sensitive applications. Additionally, the DBDAA introduces a primary unsafe sequence mechanism that enhances the acceptability and efficiency of the algorithm by allowing processes to participate in safety checks repeatedly after a predetermined amount of system-defined time. Experimental comparisons with existing algorithms demonstrate the superiority of the DBDAA in terms of reduced safe state prediction time and increased efficiency, making it a robust solution for deadlock avoidance in real-time systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.