ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise Optimization of Basic Signal Component Extraction for Cryogenic and On-Scalp Magnetoencephalography (MEG).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
- Using Wearable MEG to Study the Neural Control of Human Stepping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Demonstrating equivalence across magnetoencephalography scanner platforms using neural fingerprinting.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable magnetoencephalography based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPM-MEG) offers non-invasive and high-fidelity measurement of human brain electrophysiology. The flexibility of OPM-MEG also means it can be deployed in participants of all ages and permits scanning during movement. However, the magnetic fields generated by neuronal currents - which form the basis of the OPM-MEG signal - are much smaller than environmental fields, and this means measurements are highly sensitive to interference. Further, OPMs have a low dynamic range, and should be operated in near-zero background field. Scanners must therefore be housed in specialised magnetically shielded rooms (MSRs), formed from multiple layers of shielding material. The MSR is a critical component, and current OPM-optimised shields are large (>3 m in height), heavy (>10,000 kg) and expensive (with up to 5 layers of material). This restricts the uptake of OPM-MEG technology. Here, we show that the application of the Maxwell filtering techniques signal space separation (SSS) and its spatiotemporal extension (tSSS) to OPM-MEG data can isolate small signals of interest measured in the presence of large interference. We compare phantom recordings and MEG data from a participant performing a motor task in a state-of-the-art 5-layer MSR, to similar data collected in a lightly shielded room: application of tSSS to data recorded in the lightly shielded room allowed accurate localisation of a dipole source in the phantom and neuronal sources in the brain. Our results point to future deployment of OPM-MEG in lighter, cheaper and easier-to-site MSRs which could catalyse widespread adoption of the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.