ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2024
From Simulation to Reality: Predicting Torque With Fatigue Onset via Transfer Learning.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transfer Learning With Simulated and Recorded Data Improves Predictions of Lateral Pinch Thumb-Tip Forces.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Neural Network Personalized Musculoskeletal Hand Models Against Current Personalization Standards Using Experimental Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fine-Wire Electromyography.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle fatigue impacts upper extremity function but is often overlooked in biomechanical models. The present work leveraged a transfer learning approach to improve torque predictions during fatiguing upper extremity movements. We developed two artificial neural networks to model sustained elbow flexion: one trained solely on recorded data (i.e., direct learning) and one pre-trained on simulated data and fine-tuned on recorded data (i.e., transfer learning). We simulated muscle activations and joint torques using a musculoskeletal model and a muscle fatigue model (n = 1,701 simulations). We also recorded static subject-specific features (e.g., anthropometric measurements) and dynamic muscle activations and torques during sustained elbow flexion in healthy young adults (n = 25 subjects). Using the simulated dataset, we pre-trained a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) to regress fatiguing elbow flexion torque from muscle activations. We concatenated this pre-trained LSTM with a feedforward architecture, and fine-tuned the model on recorded muscle activations and static features to predict elbow flexion torques. We trained a similar architecture solely on the recorded data and compared each neural network's predictions on 5 leave-out subjects' data. The transfer learning model outperformed the direct learning model, as indicated by a decrease of 24.9% in their root-mean-square-errors (6.22 Nm and 8.28 Nm, respectively). The transfer learning model and direct learning model outperformed analogous musculoskeletal simulations, which consistently underpredicted elbow flexion torque. Our results suggest that transfer learning from simulated to recorded datasets can decrease reliance on assumptions inherent to biomechanical models and yield predictions robust to real-world conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.