Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39302714›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Evaluating a Natural Language Processing-Driven, AI-Assisted International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, Coding System for Diagnosis Related Groups in a Real Hospital Environment: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Hong-Jie Dai, Chen-Kai Wang, Chien-Chang Chen, Chong-Sin Liou, An-Tai Lu, Chia-Hsin Lai, Bo-Tsz Shain, Cheng-Rong Ke, William Yu Chung Wang, Tatheer Hussain Mir and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hong-Jie DaiIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-7255
Chen-Kai WangIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1830-2915
Chien-Chang ChenElectromagnetic Sensing Control and AI Computing System Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0008-0103-3089
Chong-Sin LiouIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0009-8024-9589
An-Tai LuSchool of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-5424-1256
Chia-Hsin LaiIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-9533-140X
Bo-Tsz ShainIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0009-6560-8416
Cheng-Rong KeIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0002-2715-4707
William Yu Chung WangWaikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1279-2127
Tatheer Hussain MirIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0007-8409-8189
Mutiara SimanjuntakIntelligent System Lab, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8024-6374
Hao-Yun Kao *Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-9314
Ming-Ju Tsai *Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-3334
Vincent S Tseng *Department of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-1594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational Classification of Diseases codes are widely used to describe diagnosis information, but manual coding relies heavily on human interpretation, which can be expensive, time consuming, and prone to errors. With the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), the coding process has become more complex, highlighting the need for automated approaches to enhance coding efficiency and accuracy. Inaccurate coding can result in substantial financial losses for hospitals, and a precise assessment of outcomes generated by a natural language processing (NLP)-driven autocoding system thus assumes a critical role in safeguarding the accuracy of the Taiwan diagnosis related groups (Tw-DRGs).

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the feasibility of applying an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), autocoding system that can automatically determine diagnoses and codes based on free-text discharge summaries to facilitate the assessment of Tw-DRGs, specifically principal diagnosis and major diagnostic categories (MDCs).

methodsBy using the patient discharge summaries from Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (KMUCHH) from April 2019 to December 2020 as a reference data set we developed artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted ICD-10-CM coding systems based on deep learning models. We constructed a web-based user interface for the AI-assisted coding system and deployed the system to the workflow of the certified coding specialists (CCSs) of KMUCHH. The data used for the assessment of Tw-DRGs were manually curated by a CCS with the principal diagnosis and MDC was determined from discharge summaries collected at KMUCHH from February 2023 to April 2023.

resultsBoth the reference data set and real hospital data were used to assess performance in determining ICD-10-CM coding, principal diagnosis, and MDC for Tw-DRGs. Among all methods, the GPT-2 (OpenAI)-based model achieved the highest F

conclusionsAn NLP-driven AI-assisted coding system can assist CCSs in ICD-10-CM coding by offering coding references via a user interface, demonstrating the potential to reduce the manual workload and expedite Tw-DRG assessment. Consistency in performance affirmed the effectiveness of the system in supporting CCSs in ICD-10-CM coding and the judgment of Tw-DRGs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInternational Classification of DiseasesNatural Language ProcessingArtificial IntelligenceHumansTaiwandeep learningelectronic medical recordInternational Classification of Diseasesnatural language processingTaiwan diagnosis related groups

Identifiers

PMID39302714
PMCPMC11452756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.