Trial reportJAMA network open2024
Wearable Device-Based Intervention for Promoting Patient Physical Activity After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03215537 (Development of Patient Tailored Guideline of Physical Activity for Lung Cancer Survivor After Surgery; to Improve the Symptoms, Complications and Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of Patient Tailored Guideline of Physical Activity for Lung Cancer Survivor After Surgery; to Improve the Symptoms, Complications and Quality of Life
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Wearable technologies for perioperative recovery monitoring in lung cancer surgery: a systematic review of feasibility, recovery outcomes, and evidence certainty.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary mHealth Rehabilitation for Patients With Abdominal Cancer Who Are Receiving Chemoradiotherapy: Randomized Phase II Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Risk of fracture among lung cancer survivors by cancer treatment modality: A population-based retrospective cohort study.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Wearable-derived postdischarge mobility as a digital biomarker for 90-day readmission and mortality in metastatic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Digital Phenotyping in Health Research: Scoping Review of Methods, Gaps, and Opportunities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- [Evaluation of Multimodal Perioperative Care Pathway Supported by a Patient-facing Mobile App in Colorectal Surgery - First Clinical Experience and Patient Satisfaction].Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2026Observational
- Article
- Lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for elderly patients with solid-predominant stage I NSCLC: survival, pulmonary function, and postoperative outcomes.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Increasing Use of Wearable Devices for Health or Activity Tracking Among Adults with Chronic Diseases in the US.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of electrical stimulation for postoperative rehabilitation of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Implementation of wearable activity trackers in hospital rehabilitation: a feasibility study tailored to local settings.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Association between Inpatient Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity and Functional Recovery following Lung Resection for Neoplastic Lung Diseases.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Experiences of post-surgery exercise among middle-aged adults with early lung cancer.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-integrated wearable biomedical devices for cancer management.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Article
- The Prostate cancer-Exercise and Metformin randomised controlled feasibility Trial (Pre-EMpT) in men following active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- The comprehensive clinical benefits of digital phenotyping: from broad adoption to full impact.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Feasibility of home step-tracking using wearable devices for older adults undergoing thoracic surgery: A brief report.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Emerging evidence suggests that wearable devices are feasible for monitoring physical activity among patients with lung cancer. However, the association between wearable devices and improvement in patient recovery after surgery remains underexplored. Objective: To evaluate the effects of a wearable device intervention on the recovery of physical activity, cardiopulmonary function, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after lung cancer surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial with a historical control was conducted at a single tertiary cancer center (Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center) in Seoul, South Korea, between October 18, 2018, and May 24, 2019. Patients were included if they had suspected or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer scheduled for curative surgery more extensive than lobectomy and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0 or 1. Patients were compared with historical control participants from data collected between September 20, 2017, and September 10, 2018, as part of the Coordinated Approach to Cancer Patients' Health for Lung Cancer (CATCH-LUNG) prospective cohort study. Data analysis was performed between June 21 and July 16, 2020. Intervention: A personalized exercise regimen monitored via a wearable device was administered to intervention patients at home in 3 stages: preoperative (from diagnosis to surgery), immediate (from discharge to 2 months after surgery), and later postoperative (from 2 to 6 months after surgery). Control patients received usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cardiopulmonary function, and the co-primary outcome was physical activity at 6 months after surgery, measured with 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and number of daily steps, using a linear regression model. Secondary outcomes were changes in cardiopulmonary function, physical activity, and HRQOL, including function and symptoms from baseline to 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Additionally, cardiopulmonary function and physical activity (number of daily steps and time spent on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA]) at 2 weeks after surgery, physical activity (time spent on MVPA) at 6 months after surgery, and HRQOL, including function and symptoms at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery, were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: This trial included 74 patients in the intervention group (mean [SD] age, 60.4 [8.7] years; 31 [41.9%] men and 43 [58.1%] women) and 120 in the control group (mean [SD] age, 60.2 [8.7] years; 65 [54.2%] men and 55 [45.8%] women). Daily steps, MVPA, and 6MWD decreased initially at 2 weeks after surgery but increased thereafter. The control group had a larger decrease in the number of daily steps from baseline compared with the intervention group (-4877 [95% CI, -5861 to -3893] steps vs -1753 [95% CI, -2968 to -539] steps) at 2 weeks after surgery. By 6 months after surgery, the intervention group increased their daily steps by 2220 (95% CI, 1006 to 3435) from baseline, whereas the control group did not return to their baseline number of steps. The intervention group had significantly more daily steps (12 321 [95% CI, 8749-15 761] vs 10 118 [95% CI, 7341-13 420]; P = .007) and had greater vigorous physical activity (33.6 [95% CI, 13.5 to 59.8] vs 18.5 [5.7 to 40.8] minutes; P = .003) at 6 months after surgery compared with the control group. No difference in 6MWD was found. However, the intervention group had better patient-reported physical function (mean [SD] score, 82.2 [17.3] vs 76.9 [17.5]; P = .04), less dyspnea (mean [SD] score, 24.8 [27.1] vs 34.5 [31.6]; P = .03), and less pain (mean [SD] score, 21.4 [20.2] vs 30.1 [26.8]; P = .01) at 2 weeks after surgery and less dyspnea (mean [SD] score, 5.4[12.4] vs 12[23.3]; P = .01) at 6 months after surgery compared with the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, integration of perioperative exercise interventions using wearable devices improved physical activity (especially MVPA) and dyspnea at 6 months after lung cancer surgery compared with usual care. This finding suggests a promising role for wearable devices in personalizing perioperative rehabilitation strategies. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03215537.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.