ArticleGeroScience2025
Associations of nighttime sleep, midday napping, and physical activity with all-cause mortality in older adults: the Seniors-ENRICA cohorts.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nighttime sleep, midday napping, and mortality in Chinese older adults: A China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study longitudinal cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- The joint association of sleep duration and physical activity with frailty among older adults: the first evidence from CHARLS.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Multiple Health Outcomes of Daytime Napping: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- The impact of sleep duration, depressive symptoms, and cognitive function on daily activity among Chinese older adults: a serial multiple mediation model.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Health, as per Life's Essential 8, and Impaired Lower-Extremity Function in Older Adults.Aging and disease · 2025Article
- The joint effects of sleep duration and exercise habit on all-cause mortality among Chinese older adult: a national community-based cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined associations between nighttime sleep and midday nap duration with all-cause mortality according to adherence to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) recommendations in older adults. We used data from 3518 and 3273 older adults recruited in the Seniors-ENRICA-1 and 2 cohorts, respectively. Nighttime sleep time was classified as short (< 7 h), middle (≥ 7 and < 8 h), and long (≥ 8 h), and midday napping as no nap, short (≤ 30 min), long (> 30 and ≤ 60 min), and very long (> 60 min). Time spent in MVPA was classified as meeting (i.e., ≥ 150 min/week) or not the MVPA recommendations. All-cause mortality was the main outcome. Analyses were performed with Cox regression and adjusted for the main confounders. Overall, compared with middle nighttime sleep, both short (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.39) and long (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.12-1.52) were associated with higher mortality. Among participants who did not meet MVPA recommendations, the association between short (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.48) and long (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.21-1.77) sleeping duration mortality remained. Short napping was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.96) and very long with higher mortality (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.59), compared to those who did not nap. Among participants not meeting MVPA recommendations, only very long napping was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01-1.73). No associations were identified between nighttime sleep or midday napping with mortality among participants meeting MVPA recommendations. Meeting MVPA recommendations can attenuate the risks associated with short or long sleep duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.