ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
Culturally Responsive Approaches to Health Research with Black Canadians: Challenges and Strategies.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering communities: a case study of integrated knowledge translation in the A/C study.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Methodological reflections from a research project on the mental health of Black youth.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCanada's Black population has more than doubled over the last two decades, with the fastest growth occurring in the Prairie provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. Despite a growing interest in Black health research in Canada, there is still limited knowledge on culturally responsive approaches to collecting, analyzing, and reporting health data on Black Canadians. This review presents a synthesis of challenges and strategies for conducting culturally responsive health research in Black communities.
methodsGuided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework [1], this scoping review addresses the questions: What cultural considerations inform health data collection methods with Black Canadians on the Prairies? What gaps exist in current use of culturally appropriate approaches to health research with this population? We systematically searched selected electronic databases-Sociological Abstracts, PsychINFO, Embase, Social Science Citation Index, Social Services Abstract, Social Work Abstracts, CINAHL, Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Library, Proquest, and Web of Science-for studies on Black health in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. We completed a citation chaining of selected studies, searched thesis repositories, and consulted Black health researchers on the Prairies. Using our inclusion criteria, we screened 453 records and selected 27 articles for the review.
resultsMost of the included articles described research conducted in Alberta (77.7%) and between 2015 and 2022 (74.1%). We identified four themes relevant to culturally responsive approaches to Black health research: use of theory in research design; research leadership; research participation, uptake, and community engagement; and data collection procedures.
conclusionsBlack leadership, critical representation on project teams, and partnerships with community gatekeepers can improve trust, acceptability, and research uptake. Cultural considerations in Black health research include attending to gender, age, and religion in data collection. There is also a need to reform research practices and guidelines to attend to the social, cultural, and religious needs of Black Canadians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39302565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.