ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Advocating Targeted Sequential Screening over Whole Exome Sequencing in 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Pipeline for the Use of Short Read Next-Generation Sequencing (SR-NGS) inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWhole exome sequencing (WES) has emerged as the preferred method for diagnosing a range of Mendelian disorders. Nonetheless, the applicability of WES in genetic diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD) remains uncertain due to the intricacies involved in molecular analysis of the CYP21A2 gene.
methodsIn this case series, authors report the outcomes of couples or families who underwent WES followed by focused sequential strategy (FSS) targeting CYP21A2 gene hotspot mutations and targeted sequencing of genes associated with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH).
resultsThis analysis revealed that WES, when compared to FSS, resulted in six false-negative findings out of seven subjects and one false-positive result. These results were corroborated through validation using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Sanger sequencing.
conclusionsOne major limitation of exome sequencing lies in target enrichment, which often achieves less than 95% coverage of the regions of interest, potentially leading to false negatives. This challenge is particularly pronounced when deciphering the complex genetics of 21-OHD, characterized by intricate pseudogene-derived rearrangements and gene conversions. Additionally, next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of the CYP21A2 gene is not straightforward due to reads aligning to pseudogene regions, necessitating stringent computational pipelines with defined targets. However, simple genotyping assays have shown a high positive yield of pseudogene-derived mutations in over 80% of cases, while targeted NGS can be valuable in subjects with initially negative results. Therefore, WES is not recommended as the primary testing method for 21-OHD and may be better suited for rare forms of CAH once CYP21A2 mutations have been ruled out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39302536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.