ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
[News on the treatment of large vessel vasculitis].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large vessel vasculitis, such as giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are primarily manifested on large and medium-sized arteries. While GCA mainly affects older people after the 6th decade of life onwards, TAK mainly affects young women under the age of 40 years. Glucocorticoids (GC) are still the standard treatment for both diseases. Refractory courses and relapses in particular often lead to long-term treatment with high cumulative doses of GC, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. To date, only the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor blocker tocilizumab has been approved for the treatment of GCA. The data on methotrexate and other conventional immunosuppressants are incomplete and in some cases contradictory. The early use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressants is recommended for TAK, although the number of randomized placebo-controlled trials is limited and no steroid-sparing treatment has yet been approved for TAK. For both diseases there is still a great need for modern and safe steroid-sparing treatment that effectively treats vasculitis, prevents damage and enables adequate disease monitoring. This article provides an overview of the current study situation and possible future treatment options for GCA and TAK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39302435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.