ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024
Identifying Comorbidity Patterns in People with and without Alzheimer's Disease Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multimorbidity is common in older adults and complicates diagnosing and care for this population. Objective: We investigated co-occurrence patterns (clustering) of medical conditions in persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their matched controls. Methods: The register-based Medication use and Alzheimer's disease study (MEDALZ) includes 70,718 community-dwelling persons with incident AD diagnosed during 2005-2011 in Finland and a matched comparison cohort. Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to cluster the comorbidities (ICD-10 diagnosis codes). Modeling was performed separately for AD and control cohorts. We experimented with different numbers of clusters (also known as topics in the field of Natural Language Processing) ranging from five to 20. Results: In both cohorts, 17 of the 20 most frequent diagnoses were the same. Based on a qualitative assessment by medical experts, the cluster patterns were not affected by the number of clusters, but the best interpretability was observed in the 10-cluster model. Quantitative assessment of the optimal number of clusters by log-likelihood estimate did not imply a specific optimal number of clusters. Multidimensional scaling visualized the variability in cluster size and (dis)similarity between the clusters with more overlapping of clusters and variation in group size seen in the AD cohort. Conclusions: Early signs and symptoms of AD were more commonly clustered together in the AD cohort than in the comparison cohort. This study experimented with using natural language processing techniques for clustering patterns from an epidemiological study. From the computed clusters, it was possible to qualitatively identify multimorbidity that differentiates AD cases and controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.