Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39302139›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Designing cancer screening trials for reduction in late-stage cancer incidence.

Kehao Zhu, Ying-Qi Zhao, Yingye Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kehao ZhuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Ying-Qi ZhaoPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-2257
Yingye ZhengPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-4200

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
Precompetitive Collaboration on Liquid Biopsy for Early Cancer Assessment: Data Management and Coordinating UnitU24CA288185 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Wei Sun, Yingye Zheng · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Statistical Methods for Prospective Evaluation of BiomarkersR01CA236558 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHENG, YINGYE · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236558NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA288185NIH HHS R01 CA236558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before implementing a biomarker test for early cancer detection into routine clinical care, the test must demonstrate clinical utility, that is, the test results should lead to clinical actions that positively affect patient-relevant outcomes. Unlike therapeutical trials for patients diagnosed with cancer, designing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to demonstrate the clinical utility of an early detection biomarker with mortality and related endpoints poses unique challenges. The hurdles stem from the prolonged natural progression of the disease and the lack of information regarding the time-varying screening effect on the target asymptomatic population. To facilitate the study design of screening trials, we propose using a generic multistate disease history model and derive model-based effect sizes. The model links key performance metrics of the test, such as sensitivity, to primary endpoints like the incidence of late-stage cancer. It also incorporates the practical implementation of the biomarker-testing program in real-world scenarios. Based on the chronological time scale aligned with RCT, our method allows the assessment of study powers based on key features of the new program, including the test sensitivity, the length of follow-up, and the number and frequency of repeated tests. The calculation tool from the proposed method will enable practitioners to perform realistic and quick evaluations when strategizing screening trials for specific diseases. We use numerical examples based on the National Lung Screening Trial to demonstrate the method.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiometryComputer SimulationHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, Tumorcancer screeningearly detection biomarkersmultistate modelrandomized controlled trialtest sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39302139
PMCPMC11413908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.