Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39302040›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Harm Reduction as a Form of 'Wrap-Around' Care: The Nursing Role.

Marissa D Abram, Adrian Jugdoyal, Paulo Seabra, Dana Murphy-Parker, Adam Searby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marissa D AbramDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adrian JugdoyalBrunel University, London, UK.
Paulo SeabraNursing School of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Dana Murphy-ParkerUniversity of Colorado Anschultz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Adam SearbyMonash University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addiction treatment, harm reduction is a philosophy that aims to reduce the harms from ongoing alcohol and other drug use. Although abstinence may be the 'gold standard' in reducing harm from ongoing alcohol and other drug use, harm reduction recognises that abstinence may not be achievable for certain individuals. Accordingly, harm reduction is used to enable medical or mental health treatment for individuals who continue to use alcohol and other drugs, providing a form of care which meets individuals where they present to healthcare facilities. Harm reduction accepts ongoing alcohol and other drug use, while providing a traditionally marginalised cohort of individuals access to healthcare services. In this perspective paper, we argue that the role of nurses in promoting and utilising harm reduction as part of their regular practice is essential to both reducing harm from alcohol and other drug use, engaging individuals who use alcohol and other drugs in healthcare services, and providing a means to accept individuals as they are to build trust and rapport for engagement in addiction treatment when they are ready, and at their own pace. Nurses, by virtue of their role and number in the healthcare landscape (approximately 28 million globally), are ideally placed to implement harm reduction in their practice to achieve better outcomes for individuals who use alcohol and other drugs.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionNursingSubstance-Related DisordersEducation, NursingHumansSocial Stigmaaddiction treatmentharm minimizationharm reductionnurse's rolenursing

Identifiers

PMID39302040
PMCPMC11751750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.