ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Predictors of Delays in the Management of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study predictors of delayed presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). STUDY
designRetrospective medical chart review and patient telephone survey.
settingTertiary medical center. SUBJECTS AND
methodsAll patients who initially presented or referred with unilateral ISSNHL between 2016 and 2020 were included. Associations between epidemiological, demographic, and socioeconomic profiles and delays in presentation, diagnosis and treatment were studied.
resultsA total of 518 patients were suitable for study inclusion. The total delay in the emergency department (ED) setup was a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 1 (0-1) day, 7 (6-12) days in a community otolaryngologist setup, and 15 (8-25) days in a general practitioner setup. Patients who presented to the ED first also had fewer diagnostic and treatment delays. Those who presented to a community otolaryngologist first had significantly longer presentation delay (5 [4-8] days p < 0.001) and significantly longer treatment delays (1 [1-3] days p < 0.001). Patients who presented to a general practitioner first had significantly longer presentation delays compared with ED presentation, and the longest diagnostic and treatment delays (3 [2-5], 8 [4-12] days, and 4 [2-7] days, p = < 0.01, p = <0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no association between socioeconomic status or demography and presentation, diagnostic, or treatment delays.
conclusionTotal delay in ISSNHL management is affected by the venue of the first medical encounter. General practitioners' level of awareness of the need for empiric steroidal treatment of ISSNHL without delay should be raised. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 135:889-893, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.