ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Local and whole-body SAR in UHF body imaging: Implications for SAR matrix compression.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved Radiofrequency Safety Modelling in MRI Using In Vivo Measurements of Brain Conductivity.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Trial
- SNR-Efficient Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) for Clinical Applications at 7 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Roadmap towards personalized approaches and safety considerations in non-ionizing radiation: from dosimetry to therapeutic and diagnostic applications.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Real-time specific absorption rate supervision for a 32-channel RF transmit system with virtual observation points.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Local and whole-body SAR in UHF body imaging: Implications for SAR matrix compression.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTransmit arrays for body imaging have characteristics of both volume and local transmit coils. This study evaluates two specific absorption rate (SAR) aspects, local and whole-body SAR, of arrays for body imaging at 7 T and also for a 3 T birdcage.
methodsSimulations were performed for six antenna arrays at 7 T and one 3 T birdcage. Local SAR matrices and the whole-body SAR matrix were computed and evaluated with random shims. A set of reduced local SAR matrices was determined by removing all matrices dominated by the whole-body SAR matrix.
resultsThe results indicate that all RF transmit coils for body imaging in this study are constrained by the local SAR limit. The ratio between local and whole-body SAR is nevertheless smaller for arrays with large FOV, as these arrays also expose a larger part of the human body. By using the whole-body SAR matrix, the number of local SAR matrices can be reduced (e.g., 33.3% matrices remained for an 8-channel local array and 89.7% for a 30-channel remote array; 12.1% for the 3 T birdcage).
conclusionFor transmit antenna arrays used for body imaging at 7 T as well as for the 3 T birdcage, all evaluated cases show that the local SAR limit was reached before reaching the whole-body SAR limit. Nevertheless, the whole-body SAR matrix can be used to reduce the number of local SAR matrices, which is important to reduce memory and computing time for a virtual observation points (VOP) compression. This step can be included as a pre-compression prior to a VOP compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.