Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301753›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2025

Predictive crystallography at scale: mapping, validating, and learning from 1000 crystal energy landscapes.

Christopher R Taylor, Patrick W V Butler, Graeme M Day

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher R TaylorSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. g.m.day@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9465-5742
Patrick W V ButlerSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. g.m.day@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-836X
Graeme M DaySchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. g.m.day@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-2771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational crystal structure prediction (CSP) is an increasingly powerful technique in materials discovery, due to its ability to reveal trends and permit insight across the possibility space of crystal structures of a candidate molecule, beyond simply the observed structure(s). In this work, we demonstrate the reliability and scalability of CSP methods for small, rigid organic molecules by performing in-depth CSP investigations for over 1000 such compounds, the largest survey of its kind to-date. We show that this highly-efficient force-field-based CSP approach is superbly predictive, locating 99.4% of observed experimental structures, and ranking a large majority of these (74%) as among the most stable possible structures (to within uncertainty due to thermal effects). We present two examples of insights such large predicted datasets can permit, examining the space group preferences of organic molecular crystals and rationalising empirical rules concerning the spontaneous resolution of chiral molecules. Finally, we exploit this large and diverse dataset for developing transferable machine-learned energy potentials for the organic solid state, training a neural network lattice energy correction to force field energies that offers substantial improvements to the already impressive energy rankings, and a MACE equivariant message-passing neural network for crystal structure re-optimisation. We conclude that the excellent performance and reliability of the CSP workflow enables the creation of very large datasets of broad utility and explanatory power in materials design.

Identifiers

PMID39301753
PMCPMC11413732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.