Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301725›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2024

Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Dan D Nguyen, Carole Decker, Christina M Pacheco, Stacy L Farr, Christine Fuss, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Stephanie Pena, Nobuhiro Ikemura, Anezi I Uzendu, David J Maron and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dan D NguyenSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-7025-4442
Carole DeckerSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).
Christina M PachecoUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, MO (C.M.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-6288-0221
Stacy L FarrSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-0738-5524
Christine FussSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).
Ruth M Masterson CreberColumbia University School of Nursing, New York City, NY (R.M.M.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-4238-9902
Stephanie PenaNew York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center (S.P., J.A.D.).
Nobuhiro IkemuraSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-6347-4460
Anezi I UzenduSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-0576-7510
David J MaronStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA (D.J.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-4867-8588
Judith S HochmanSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (D.D.N., C.D., S.L.F., C.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).
John A DodsonNew York University Grossman School of Medicine and Langone Medical Center (S.P., J.A.D.).
John A SpertusUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (D.D.N., S.L.F., N.I., A.I.U., J.A.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-2839-2611

Funding

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
The Ischemia Trial - CCCU01HL105907 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2011 to 2019
$100.1M
The ISCHEMIA Trial - SDCCU01HL105462 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, KAREN P, O'BRIEN, SEAN M · 2011 to 2019
$17.8M
THE ISCHEMIA TRIAL - IICCU01HL105561 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SHAW, LESLEE J · 2011 to 2018
$6.5M
CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL110837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI JOHN A SPERTUS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
The ISCHEMIA Trial - EQOLU01HL105565 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2011 to 2017
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110837NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105462NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105561NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105565NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPursuing initial invasive or conservative management of chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a preference-sensitive decision that should include shared decision-making. Communicating the benefits of either approach is challenging, as individual patients rarely achieve the population-averaged outcomes reported in clinical trials. Our objective was to develop a patient decision aid (PDA) with patient-specific estimates of outcomes for initial invasive versus conservative management of CCD, based on the ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches).

methodsThis was a multiphase mixed-methods study using focus groups of outpatients with CCD, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Focus groups were held in Kansas City, MO and New York City, NY between September 2021 and June 2022. Patients with CCD were included if they had a positive stress test within 1 year. Phase 1 focused on patient priorities for outcomes to guide treatment decisions. Phase 2 involved PDA development and refinement. Phase 3 involved further refinement and member checking. Key themes involving shared decision-making and treatment preferences were elicited from focus groups using a deductive approach to develop a PDA representing the outcomes most important to patients.

resultsOf 46 patient and caregiver participants, the mean age was 63.5 years, 53% were female, 61% were White, 24% were Black, and 9% were Hispanic. When deciding between treatments, participants valued shared decision-making but generally deferred decisions to clinicians. The outcomes most important to participants were survival and quality of life, followed by physical functioning and symptoms. To represent these outcomes, participants favored simple visualizations, such as a speedometer or health meter. When deciding between treatment options, participants preferred to use the PDA collaboratively with a clinician instead of as a stand-alone tool.

conclusionsOur novel, patient-centered approach to developing a PDA for CCD with patient-specific outcomes has the potential to rapidly translate clinical trial results to individual patients and support shared decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesFocus GroupsPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceAgedChronic DiseaseClinical Decision-MakingCoronary DiseaseFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityTreatment Outcomecoronary angiographycoronary artery bypasscoronary artery diseaseischemiapercutaneous coronary interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID39301725
PMCPMC12207636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.