Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301571›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research communications2024

From consumption to context: assessing poverty and inequality across diverse socio-ecological systems in Ghana.

Alicia C Cavanaugh, Honor R Bixby, Saeesh Mangwani, Samuel Agyei-Mensah, Cynthia Azochiman Awuni, Jill C Baumgartner, George Owusu, Brian E Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alicia C CavanaughDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-8397
Honor R BixbyInstitute of Public Health and Wellbeing, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-5292
Saeesh MangwaniIMBERSea, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5436-471X
Samuel Agyei-MensahDepartment of Geography and Resource Development, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6418-393X
Cynthia Azochiman AwuniDepartment of Geography and Resource Development, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-535X
Jill C BaumgartnerDepartment of Ethics, Equity and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-6380
George OwusuInstitute of Statistical, Social & Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-5540
Brian E RobinsonDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-8318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local social and ecological contexts influence the experience of poverty and inequality in a number of ways that include shaping livelihood opportunities and determining the available infrastructure, services and environmental resources, as well as people's capacity to use them. The metrics used to define poverty and inequality function to guide local and international development policy but how these interact with the local ecological contexts is not well explored. We use a social-ecological systems (SES) lens to empirically examine how context relates to various measures of human well-being at a national scale in Ghana. Using a novel dataset constructed from the 100% Ghanian Census, we examine poverty and inequality at a fine population level across and within multiple dimensions of well-being. First, we describe how well-being varies within different Ghanian SES contexts. Second, we ask whether monetary consumption acts a good indicator for well-being across these contexts. Third, we examine measures of inequality in various metrics across SES types. We find consumption distributions differ across SES types and are markedly distinct from regional distributions based on political boundaries. Rates of improved well-being are positively correlated with consumption levels in all SES types, but correlations are weaker in less-developed contexts like, rangelands and wildlands. Finally, while consumption inequality is quite consistent across SES types, inequality in other measures of living standards (housing, water, sanitation, etc) increases dramatically in SES types as population density and infrastructural development decreases. We advocate that SES types should be recognized as distinct contexts in which actions to mitigate poverty and inequality should better incorporate the challenges unique to each.

Indexed as

multiple dimensions of inequalitymultiple dimensions of povertysocial-ecological systemssub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID39301571
PMCPMC11408744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.