ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Meta-analysis of set-based multiple phenotype association test based on GWAS summary statistics from different cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the shared genetic architecture of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a genomic structural equation modeling analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Integrating network annotation from multiple correlated traits to improve polygenic risk scores based on GWAS summary statistics.Research square · 2026Article
- Constructing genotype and phenotype network helps reveal disease heritability and phenome-wide association studies.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Network construction using sparse Gaussian graphical model based on GWAS summary statistics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged as popular tools for identifying genetic variants that are associated with complex diseases. Standard analysis of a GWAS involves assessing the association between each variant and a disease. However, this approach suffers from limited reproducibility and difficulties in detecting multi-variant and pleiotropic effects. Although joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for GWAS can identify and interpret pleiotropic loci which are essential to understand pleiotropy in diseases and complex traits, most of the multiple phenotype association tests are designed for a single variant, resulting in much lower power, especially when their effect sizes are small and only their cumulative effect is associated with multiple phenotypes. To overcome these limitations, set-based multiple phenotype association tests have been developed to enhance statistical power and facilitate the identification and interpretation of pleiotropic regions. In this research, we propose a new method, named Meta-TOW-S, which conducts joint association tests between multiple phenotypes and a set of variants (such as variants in a gene) utilizing GWAS summary statistics from different cohorts. Our approach applies the set-based method that Tests for the effect of an Optimal Weighted combination of variants in a gene (TOW) and accounts for sample size differences across GWAS cohorts by employing the Cauchy combination method. Meta-TOW-S combines the advantages of set-based tests and multi-phenotype association tests, exhibiting computational efficiency and enabling analysis across multiple phenotypes while accommodating overlapping samples from different GWAS cohorts. To assess the performance of Meta-TOW-S, we develop a phenotype simulator package that encompasses a comprehensive simulation scheme capable of modeling multiple phenotypes and multiple variants, including noise structures and diverse correlation patterns among phenotypes. Simulation studies validate that Meta-TOW-S maintains a desirable Type I error rate. Further simulation under different scenarios shows that Meta-TOW-S can improve power compared with other existing meta-analysis methods. When applied to four psychiatric disorders summary data, Meta-TOW-S detects a greater number of significant genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.