Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301513›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Addressing pollution challenges for enterprises under diverse extreme climate conditions: artificial intelligence-driven experience and policy support of top Chinese enterprises.

Jingjing Sun, Xin Guan, Yanzhao Zeng, Jiali Zhang, Xiaodie Chen, Xi Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingjing Sun *School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin Guan *Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan, China.
Yanzhao Zeng *School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiali ZhangSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodie ChenSchool of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Xi ZhanSchool of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the experiences of leading Chinese companies in environmental conservation under varying extreme climate conditions, focusing on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and governmental assistance. Methods: A survey was conducted involving 200 participants to assess recognition and endorsement of AI's role in environmental protection and to explore the adoption of AI technologies by firms for enhancing environmental management practices. Results: The survey revealed widespread recognition of Tencent's green initiatives and strong support for AI's role in environmental protection. Many firms are considering adopting AI technologies to optimize energy management, deploy intelligent HVAC systems, and improve the operations of data centers and smart lighting systems. Discussion: The findings highlight a strong belief in AI's potential to advance environmental protection efforts, with a call for increased governmental support to foster this development. The study underscores the importance of a partnership between businesses and governments to leverage AI for environmental sustainability, contributing significantly to conservation efforts.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChinaClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PollutionSurveys and Questionnairesartificial intelligence technologydiverse extreme climateenvironmental protectionpolicy supporttop Chinese enterprises

Identifiers

PMID39301513
PMCPMC11410622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.