ArticleIEEE sensors journal2024
Hybrid Deep Learning and Model-Based Needle Shape Prediction.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Needle insertion using flexible bevel tip needles are a common minimally-invasive surgical technique for prostate cancer interventions. Flexible, asymmetric bevel tip needles enable physicians for complex needle steering techniques to avoid sensitive anatomical structures during needle insertion. For accurate placement of the needle, predicting the trajectory of these needles intra-operatively would greatly reduce the need for frequently needle reinsertions thus improving patient comfort and positive outcomes. However, predicting the trajectory of the needle during insertion is a complex task that has yet to be solved due to random needle-tissue interactions. In this paper, we present and validate for the first time a hybrid deep learning and model-based approach to handle the intra-operative needle shape prediction problem through, leveraging a validated Lie-group theoretic model for needle shape representation. Furthermore, we present a novel self-supervised learning and method in conjunction with the Lie-group shape model for training these networks in the absence of data, enabling further refinement of these networks with transfer learning. Needle shape prediction was performed in single-layer and double-layer homogeneous phantom tissue for C- and S-shape needle insertions. Our method demonstrates an average root-mean-square prediction error of 1.03 mm over a dataset containing approximately 3,000 prediction samples with maximum prediction steps of 110 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.