ArticleCureus2024
Early Intervention in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using an Activator Appliance: A Case Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of orthodontics has traditionally been regarded as the primary specialty within dentistry. As per Dr. Tweed's recommendation, historical treatment approaches often entailed the extraction of four premolar teeth. Nonetheless, early orthodontic intervention can frequently obviate the necessity for extractions, thus preserving the integrity, functionality, and aesthetic appeal of the dentition. This case report details a non-extraction approach for managing a developing skeletal Class II malocclusion, characterized by a skeletal disharmony between the maxilla and mandible. The chosen treatment option is influenced by factors such as the patient's age, growth potential, the severity of the malocclusion, and the patient's adherence to the prescribed treatment regimen. Myofunctional appliances have been identified as effective in addressing Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulting from mandibular retrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.