Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301358›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Community Health Dialogue Implementation for the Solution of Loneliness in Rural Communities: Autoethnography.

Ryuichi Ohta, Toshihiro Yakabe, Hiroshi Adachi, Chiaki Sano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryuichi OhtaCommuniy Care, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.
Toshihiro YakabeFamily Medicine, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.
Hiroshi AdachiFamily Medicine, Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, JPN.
Chiaki SanoCommunity Medicine Management, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIsolation and loneliness among older adults in rural communities pose significant risks to physical and mental health, leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. This study investigates the impact of continual rural health dialogues facilitated by family physicians on reducing loneliness and enhancing community health in Unnan City, Shimane Prefecture, Japan.

methodUsing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted a qualitative study involving 165 participants over 65 from five rural communities between April 2022 and March 2024. Monthly health dialogues covered chronic diseases, exercise, and polypharmacy. Data were collected through ethnographic observations, focus group interviews, and field notes, with iterative coding and analysis to identify themes and concepts.

resultsThree primary themes emerged: the existence of loneliness and its impact on health, motivation to address loneliness through a sense of security, and recognition of the importance of community engagement in reducing loneliness. Participants reported increased health awareness, enhanced community interaction, and recognition of loneliness's prevalence and health impacts. Regular dialogues fostered trust with healthcare professionals, encouraged proactive health management, and facilitated supportive community connections. These interactions significantly reduced feelings of loneliness and improved health outcomes.

conclusionContinual rural health dialogues effectively mitigate loneliness and enhance health outcomes in rural communities by fostering regular interactions and building supportive networks. These findings underscore the importance of community engagement and continuous relationships with healthcare professionals in addressing loneliness. Policymakers and healthcare providers should consider integrating such dialogues into rural health strategies to promote healthier, more connected communities. Future research should explore these interventions' long-term sustainability and broader applicability across diverse rural settings.

Indexed as

agedcommunity health servicesfamily medicinegeneral medicinelonelinessprimary carequalitative researchrural healthsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID39301358
PMCPMC11411002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.