ArticleCureus2024
Awareness and Knowledge of Ionizing Radiation in Common Radiological Investigation and Associated Risks Among Medical and Applied Medical Sciences Students at Majmaah University.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who will keep patients safe? The largest multi-centre survey of healthcare students exposes critical gaps in radiation safety education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to evaluate the awareness and knowledge of ionizing radiation in common radiological investigations, as well as the associated risks, among medical and applied medical sciences students at Majmaah University in Majmaah, Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved 209 participants who completed an anonymous electronic questionnaire consisting of 21 questions. Participants were categorized based on demographic characteristics and assessed for their awareness and knowledge of radiation and its associated risks. Data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Qualitative data comparisons were performed using the Chi-square test, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 209 participants completed the questionnaire, with a nearly equal distribution of males (49.8%) and females (50.2%). Most of the participants were medical students (59.3%). The overall knowledge score had a mean of 2 (SD=2) and a range of 0-7. The overall awareness score had a mean of 3 (SD=2) and a range of 0-6. Male gender and knowledge had a significant association (p=0.022). Applied medical sciences students had a significantly higher awareness level than medical students (p=0.004). There was a significant association between academic level and knowledge level (p=0.025), which was highest among third-year students.
conclusionOverall medical and applied medical sciences students' knowledge and awareness of ionizing radiation dose and the health risks associated with it was reported to be low. The results highlight the need to train medical and applied medical sciences students with sufficient radiological education that enable them to adhere to safe practices in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.