Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301333›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Bjørn Ibsen: What Made Intensive Care So Critical?

Diego Ángeles-Sistac, Indalecio Morán-Chorro, Luis Morales-Quinteros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and Future Perspectives of Obstetric Intensive Care Units in China.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. [Intensive care and emergency medicine overuse and sustainability].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diego Ángeles-SistacCritical Care Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, ESP.
Indalecio Morán-ChorroCritical Care Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, ESP.
Luis Morales-QuinterosCritical Care Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, ESP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical importance of intensive care units (ICUs), a field institutionalized by Bjørn Ibsen during the 1952 polio epidemic in Copenhagen. Ibsen's groundbreaking innovations, including positive pressure ventilation and real-time physiological monitoring, laid the foundation for modern intensive care medicine. Trained in Denmark and the United States, Ibsen demonstrated the effectiveness of manual ventilation during the polio outbreak after successfully resuscitating a young patient, Vivi Ebert, which in turn led to the creation of the world's first multidisciplinary ICU at Blegdams Hospital. This article explores the historical context and significance of Ibsen's contributions, tracing the evolution of the physiology of breathing from the early concepts of Vesalius and Hook to the widespread application of ventilation techniques. The establishment of the ICU introduced new ethical dilemmas, highlighting the delicate balance between prolonging life and maintaining patient dignity. Ibsen's legacy extends beyond medical advancements to the compassionate care he championed, a principle that remains a cornerstone of modern intensive care. This ethical complexity is a crucial aspect of the history of intensive care medicine.

Indexed as

bioethicsbjørn aage ibsencritical and intensive carecritical care anesthesiologyhistorical vignettehistory of medicinejordi mancebomechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID39301333
PMCPMC11411485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.