ArticleMedicine international
Multi‑label classification of biomedical data.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Instincts, Machine Decisions: Evaluating AI Accuracy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- A Stacked Ensemble Multi-Label Model for Predicting Co-Occurring Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2026Article
- A Hierarchical Deep Learning Architecture for Diagnosing Retinal Diseases Using Cross-Modal OCT to Fundus Translation in the Lack of Paired Data.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical datasets constitute a rich source of information, containing multivariate data collected during medical practice. In spite of inherent challenges, such as missing or imbalanced data, these types of datasets are increasingly utilized as a basis for the construction of predictive machine-learning models. The prediction of disease outcomes and complications could inform the process of decision-making in the hospital setting and ensure the best possible patient management according to the patient's features. Multi-label classification algorithms, which are trained to assign a set of labels to input samples, can efficiently tackle outcome prediction tasks. Myocardial infarction (MI) represents a widespread health risk, accounting for a significant portion of heart disease-related mortality. Moreover, the danger of potential complications occurring in patients with MI during their period of hospitalization underlines the need for systems to efficiently assess the risks of patients with MI. In order to demonstrate the critical role of applying machine-learning methods in medical challenges, in the present study, a set of multi-label classifiers was evaluated on a public dataset of MI-related complications to predict the outcomes of hospitalized patients with MI, based on a set of input patient features. Such methods can be scaled through the use of larger datasets of patient records, along with fine-tuning for specific patient sub-groups or patient populations in specific regions, to increase the performance of these approaches. Overall, a prediction system based on classifiers trained on patient records may assist healthcare professionals in providing personalized care and efficient monitoring of high-risk patient subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.