ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
What Patient-related Factors Most Strongly Influence Autologous Fat Grafting Volume Retention in Breast Augmentation?
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Postoperative Volumetric Assessment of Implant-Only and Composite Breast Augmentation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of donor site on fat graft survival in autologous fat transfer to the breast: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Outcomes and Complications of Autologous Fat Transfer for Total Breast Reconstruction and Augmentation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Preclinical Volume Retention of Fat Grafts Processed with REVOLVE™ Technology or Decantation Methods in Irradiated and Nonirradiated Wounds.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regarding autologous fat grafting for breast augmentation, the factors influencing volume retention are unclear. Few studies have assessed which factors, particularly patient-related variables, could affect volume retention and to what extent, without performing multivariate analysis. In this study, we performed three-dimensional breast volume measurements before and after autologous fat grafting, calculated the volume and volume retention, and investigated factors that may affect volume retention. Methods: A total of 204 breasts that underwent autologous fat grafting by the same surgeon at our hospital between May 25 and December 25, 2021 were included. Volumetric measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using a three-dimensional camera; volume retention was calculated. Linear mixed model analysis was performed to examine the effects of age, body mass index, number of total autologous fat grafting procedures, pregnancy and lactation history, smoking status, fat processing techniques (sedimentation versus centrifugation), preoperative volume, and weight change at the 3- and 6-month postoperative volume retention analyses. Results: Using multivariate analysis, the preoperative volume was found to be a significant factor at 3 and 6 months. The preoperative volume affected fat volume retention rate by 0.004 ( Conclusions: The preoperative volume likely affected fat volume retention. Specifically, a 100-mL increase in the preoperative breast volume might increase the volume retention by 4%-8%. Preoperative volume is an important confounding factor for future studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.