Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39301245›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2024

Association of ambient air pollutant mixtures with IVF/ICSI-ET clinical pregnancy rates during critical exposure periods.

Rui-Ling Liu, Tong Wang, Ying-Ling Yao, Xing-Yu Lv, Yu-Ling Hu, Xin-Zhen Chen, Xiao-Jun Tang, Zhao-Hui Zhong, Li-Juan Fu, Xin Luo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic Associations between Ambient PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Probabilistic human health risk assessment of PMFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rui-Ling LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Toxicology, Key Lab of Medical Protection for Electromagnetic Radiation, Ministry of Education of China, Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Ying-Ling YaoDepartment of Toxicology, Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xing-Yu LvThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yu-Ling HuThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xin-Zhen ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiao-Jun TangDepartment of Toxicology, Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhao-Hui ZhongDepartment of Toxicology, Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li-Juan FuDepartment of Toxicology, Joint International Research Laboratory of Reproduction and Development of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xin LuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li-Hong GengThe Reproductive Center, Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women & Children's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shao-Min YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The People's Hospital of Yubei, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2155-8211
Yu-Bin DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-9445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes exposure to a mixture of ambient air pollutants during specific exposure periods influence clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer (ET) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: The specific exposure period from ET to the serum hCG test was identified as a critical exposure window as exposure to sulfur dioxide (SO WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Exposure to a single pollutant may impact pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ART. However, in daily life, individuals often encounter mixed pollution, and limited research exists on the effects of mixed air pollutants and the specific exposure periods. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This retrospective cohort study involved infertile patients who underwent their initial IVF/ICSI-ET cycle at an assisted reproduction center between January 2020 and January 2023. Exclusions were applied for patients meeting specific criteria, such as no fresh ET, incomplete clinical and address information, residency outside the 17 cities in the Sichuan Basin, age over 45 years, use of donor semen, thin endometrium (<8 mm) and infertility factors unrelated to tubal or ovulation issues. In total, 5208 individuals were included in the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsDaily average levels of six air pollutants (fine particulate matter (PM MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The clinical pregnancy rate for participants during the study period was 54.53%. Single-pollutant logistic models indicated that for PM LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Caution was advised in interpreting the results due to the retrospective nature of the study, which was prone to selection bias from non-random sampling. Smoking and alcohol, known confounding factors in IVF/ICSI-ET, were not accounted for. Only successful cycles that reached the hCG test were included, excluding a few patients who did not reach the ET stage. While IDW was used to estimate pollutant concentrations at residential addresses, data on participants' work locations and activity patterns were not collected, potentially affecting the accuracy of exposure prediction. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsExposure to a mixture of pollutants, spanning from ET to the serum hCG test (Period 3), appeared to be correlated with a diminished probability of achieving clinical pregnancy. This association suggested a potential impact of mixed pollutants on the interaction between embryos and the endometrium, as well as embryo implantation during this critical stage, potentially contributing to clinical pregnancy failure. This underscored the importance of providing women undergoing ART with comprehensive information to comprehend the potential environmental influences and motivating them to adopt suitable protective measures when feasible, thereby mitigating potential adverse effects of contaminants on reproductive health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work received support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFC2705900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82171664, 81971391, 82171668), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality of China (Nos. CSTB2022NSCQ-LZX0062, CSTB2023TIAD-KPX0052) and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering (No. 2021KFKT013). The authors report no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

ARTBayesian kernel machine regressionclinical pregnancymixture pollutantsquantile g-computationspecific exposure periods

Identifiers

PMID39301245
PMCPMC11412601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.